Why Are Stars Hot and How Does Fusion Affect Their Temperature?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Stars are hot primarily due to gravitational collapse, which increases temperature and pressure until nuclear fusion occurs. During fusion, mass is converted into energy, which generates heat and is radiated away as light, contributing to the star's temperature. However, fusion can also be viewed as a cooling process, as the energy produced is emitted in the form of positrons, neutrinos, and gamma rays, effectively reducing the star's total mass-energy. Understanding the balance between gravitational forces and fusion energy is crucial in comprehending stellar temperatures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fusion processes
  • Familiarity with gravitational forces and their effects on stellar formation
  • Basic knowledge of astrophysics concepts such as mass-energy equivalence
  • Awareness of energy emission mechanisms in stars
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the process of nuclear fusion in stars, focusing on the proton-proton chain and CNO cycle
  • Explore the role of gravitational collapse in stellar evolution
  • Study the concept of mass-energy equivalence as described by Einstein's equation E=mc²
  • Investigate the mechanisms of energy loss in stars, including radiation and neutrino emission
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental processes that govern stellar temperatures and energy dynamics.

dykuma
Messages
55
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Why are stars hot?

Homework Equations


Non specifically, it's a conceptual question.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have always heard that stars are hot because (as a quick very basic example) stars are large collections of mass which collapse in on itself. Eventually the individual protons of this mass are able to tunnel past the Coulomb barrier and engage in fusion. Because of the mass defect, some mass is lost during fusion as energy, and this energy is what generates most of the heat of a star.

With that being said, I recall during a lecture in my astrophysics class that fusion can actually be thought of as a cooling process for the star. If it is not fusion that makes the star hot, then what is it? (this is not to say what I wrote above is wrong, but rather I am looking for a different way to view what produces the heat in a star.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dykuma said:
I have always heard that stars are hot because (as a quick very basic example) stars are large collections of mass which collapse in on itself. Eventually the individual protons of this mass are able to tunnel past the Coulomb barrier and engage in fusion. Because of the mass defect, some mass is lost during fusion as energy, and this energy is what generates most of the heat of a star.

Correct.

dykuma said:
With that being said, I recall during a lecture in my astrophysics class that fusion can actually be thought of as a cooling process for the star.

Correct. Where does the energy created by fusion go?
 
dykuma said:
Why are stars hot?
Fusion, as you would have confirmed with a small amount of research.

EDIT: Ah, CWaters beat me to it
 
Correct. Where does the energy created by fusion go?
What exactly go you mean by, "where does the energy go?" If I remember correctly, the energy goes off in the form of positrons, neutrinos, and gamma rays. so specifically, light?

I recall that we set up a long list of equations for the sun to reach an equilibrium. basically we equated the force of gravity inward vs pressure outward. The pressure had multiple components, including photon pressure.

My initial assumption with this is that gravity initiates the fusion process by forcing the mass to be close together, and the fusion produces energy which forces the star to expand outward. If heat is generated by contraction, then expansion is cooling. However I have a hard time accepting that, because if it were not for the fusion in the first place, then no heat would have been generated anyway. It is kind of like blaming a car accident for just driving, if I can make a bad analogy.
 
dykuma said:
What exactly go you mean by, "where does the energy go?" I
He means that the answer to your original question "why are stars hot" can be found by thinking about where the energy of fusion goes. Do you think neutrinos make us feel the heat of the sun? Positrons? Think about what it means that we "feel heat from the sun".
 
dykuma said:
What exactly go you mean by, "where does the energy go?" If I remember correctly, the energy goes off in the form of positrons, neutrinos, and gamma rays. so specifically, light?

Exactly. Stars loose energy in the form of light and loosing energy is effectively a cooling process.
 
(disregard this post, the question was answered before I posted this)

phinds said:
He means that the answer to your original question "why are stars hot" can be found by thinking about where the energy of fusion goes. Do you think neutrinos make us feel the heat of the sun? Positrons? Think about what it means that we "feel heat from the sun".

We feel heat from the sun due to the large amount of light that it emits from the fusion reactions in the core.

What I am trying to recall is something that the professor in the class said. It was an offhand comment that fusion can be viewed as a cooling process. I am trying to understand how fusion could be viewed in such a way.
 
Last edited:
CWatters said:
Exactly. Stars loose energy in the form of light and loosing energy is effectively a cooling process.

Ah, so similar to how boiling is a cooling process?

Okay, so then if the light that is emitted by fusion reactions is a cooling process, then what can I say that makes the star hot? Is it also fusion, gravitational potential energy? Like I said in the previous comment, I have a problem with saying that gravity makes a star hot. I know that heat will be generated as a result of gravity (such as with accretion disks), however white dwarfs are effectively cooling stars that are no longer producing heat, even though they are super dense.
 
The fusion is responsible for releasing energy which eventually radiates away from the star.
As a result the total mass-energy of the star has been reduced.
 
  • #10
dykuma said:
Ah, so similar to how boiling is a cooling process?

Okay, so then if the light that is emitted by fusion reactions is a cooling process, then what can I say that makes the star hot? Is it also fusion, gravitational potential energy? Like I said in the previous comment, I have a problem with saying that gravity makes a star hot. I know that heat will be generated as a result of gravity (such as with accretion disks), however white dwarfs are effectively cooling stars that are no longer producing heat, even though they are super dense.

There are some good descriptions of how stars work on the web.

In short gravity increases the temperature and pressure until fusion occurs. Fusion releases energy heating the star and radiating light out into space

Regarding the cooling process. Consider an electric heater. The electricity makes the heater hot causing it to emit IR radiation. The emission of IR radiation can also be called a cooling process. It doesn't make the heater colder but it stops the heater getting ever hotter and hotter.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K