B Why are SU(3), SU(2) and U(1) groups used in the Standard Model?

Click For Summary
The Standard Model of particle physics is described by the groups SU(3), SU(2), and U(1), which are essential for maintaining symmetry and invariance in the equations governing particle interactions. The choice of these groups is not definitively understood, paralleling the broader question of why the laws of nature are as they are. Any alternative group, such as SU(5), would similarly raise questions about its own justification. Ultimately, the effectiveness of these groups is evidenced by their successful predictions matching experimental observations. The discussion highlights the ongoing exploration of the foundational aspects of particle physics symmetries.
wasi-uz-zaman
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
under symmetry SU and U groups are used to confirm invariance of certain quantities.
hi,
i have studied Standard Model for particle physics - at present it is described by three groups -
1650846005864.png

i have studied - these groups but could not establish what particular feature suggest of these group to be used to describe SM.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These describe the equations of the SM. This question is isomorphic to "why are the laws of nature what they are and not something else". Nobody knows. Further, any answer will lead to the same question: if I told you they were subgroups of SU(5) wouldn't that just beg the question "why SU(5)?"
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn and vanhees71
Because the predictions that come out match observations.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn, protonsarecool, mfb and 1 other person
wasi-uz-zaman said:
Summary:: under symmetry SU and U groups are used to confirm invariance of certain quantities.

hi,
i have studied Standard Model for particle physics - at present it is described by three groups - View attachment 300525
i have studied - these groups but could not establish what particular feature suggest of these group to be used to describe SM.
Thanks
For historical and mathematical motivations, see my posts in
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-su-2-times-u-1-for-the-sm.846099/
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Crc, vanhees71, ohwilleke and 1 other person
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...