Why Are Symmetric & Non-Symmetric Matrices Not Unitarily Equivalent?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter namegoeshere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Two matrices cannot be unitarily equivalent if one is Hermitian (conjugate symmetric) and the other is not. A matrix A is Hermitian if it equals the complex conjugate of its transpose, denoted as A = A*. For two matrices A and B to be unitarily equivalent, there must exist a unitary matrix U such that A = U* B U. The discussion establishes that if A is Hermitian, then B must also be Hermitian, confirming that the properties of symmetry are preserved under unitary transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of unitary matrices and their definitions
  • Familiarity with matrix operations, including transposition and complex conjugation
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, particularly matrix similarity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian matrices in detail
  • Learn about unitary transformations and their applications in linear algebra
  • Explore the relationship between symmetric and Hermitian matrices
  • Investigate orthogonal matrices and their role in real-valued matrix equivalence
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced matrix theory and its applications in quantum mechanics or numerical analysis.

namegoeshere
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I heard this assertion during a discussion:

If two matrices are similar, but one is symmetric and the other is not, then the two matrices are not unitarily equivalent.

Why is this true? This was only mentioned in passing, and I definitely don't understand why.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume that when you say "symmetric" you really mean conjugate symmetric (Hermitian). A matrix ##A## is Hermitian if it equals the complex conjugate of its transpose: ##A = A^*##.

If ##A## and ##B## are unitarily equivalent, then there exists a unitary matrix ##U## (i.e., ##U## satisfies ##U^* U = U U^* = I##) such that ##A = U^* B U##.

If ##A## is Hermitian, then ##A = A^* = U^* B^* U##. Therefore,
$$U^* B U = U^* B^* U$$
Multiplying this equation on the left by ##U## and on the right by ##U^*##, we conclude that ##B = B^*##.

In exactly the same way, we can show that if ##B^* = B##, then ##A^* = A##.

Therefore ##A## is Hermitian if and only if ##B## is Hermitian.

If all the matrices involved are real-valued, then you can replace "unitary" with "orthogonal" and "Hermitian" with "symmetric."
 
jbunniii said:
I assume that when you say "symmetric" you really mean conjugate symmetric (Hermitian). A matrix ##A## is Hermitian if it equals the complex conjugate of its transpose: ##A = A^*##.

If ##A## and ##B## are unitarily equivalent, then there exists a unitary matrix ##U## (i.e., ##U## satisfies ##U^* U = U U^* = I##) such that ##A = U^* B U##.

If ##A## is Hermitian, then ##A = A^* = U^* B^* U##. Therefore,
$$U^* B U = U^* B^* U$$
Multiplying this equation on the left by ##U## and on the right by ##U^*##, we conclude that ##B = B^*##.

In exactly the same way, we can show that if ##B^* = B##, then ##A^* = A##.

Therefore ##A## is Hermitian if and only if ##B## is Hermitian.

If all the matrices involved are real-valued, then you can replace "unitary" with "orthogonal" and "Hermitian" with "symmetric."

D'oh. Yes, I meant conjugate symmetric. Thanks. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K