MHB Why are the cubic roots of 1 expressed as cis 120 degrees?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Roots
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello

I didn't know in which forum to put this...

I solved a linear algebra question, and my answer was:

{1}^{1/3}

which to my understanding is 1. In the book however, they said it is equal to cis 120k k=0,1,2,...

where 120 is degrees. I tried taking the complex number 1+0i and turn it into it's polar version but did not get 120 degrees. Can you explain to me why the cubic root of 1 is cis 120 ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's let:

$$x^3=1=e^{2\pi ki}$$

Hence:

$$x=e^{\frac{2}{3}\pi ki}=\text{cis}\left(\frac{2k}{3}\pi\right)$$
 
I see...

but why did they do it in the first place ?

Am I wrong that the cubic root of 1 is 1 ?

What about the quarter root of 1 ?
 
Yankel said:
I see...

but why did they do it in the first place ?

Am I wrong that the cubic root of 1 is 1 ?

What about the quarter root of 1 ?

If you restrict yourself to real roots, then $x=1$ is the only such real root. However, as I am sure you know, a cubic equation will have 3 roots, and since there is only 1 real root to the equation in question, we know there must be two complex roots, and we know further that they are conjugates.

The quarter or 4th root of 1 will satisfy:

$$x^4=1$$

You can solve this by factoring. In general we will find the $n$th roots of unity to be equally spaced about the unit circle in an Argand diagram, where $$\theta=\frac{2k\pi}{n}$$ with $0\le k<n,\,k\in\mathbb{Z}$.
 
Yankel said:
I see...

but why did they do it in the first place ?

Am I wrong that the cubic root of 1 is 1 ?

What about the quarter root of 1 ?

You're not wrong, but you're not entirely right, either.

First, what do we MEAN by: "a cube root of 1"?

We mean some "number" $x$ such that: $x^3 = 1$. Clearly, 1 works, since: $1^3 = 1$.

Another way to phrase this is:

$x^3 - 1 = 0$

Now, $x^3 - 1 = (x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1)$.

Taking $x = 1$, we see the left factor is 0, so the whole product is 0.

But what if $x \neq 1$? Could it be possible that $x^2 + x + 1 = 0$?

Well, if we use the quadratic formula, with $a = b = c = 1$, we obtain:

$x = \dfrac{-1 \pm \sqrt{1^2 - 4(1)(1)}}{2} = \dfrac{-1 \pm \sqrt{-3}}{2}$

which can be written in the form:

$x = -\dfrac{1}{2} \pm i\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$.

Note that this is:

$x = \cos\left(\dfrac{2\pi}{3}\right) \pm i\sin\left(\dfrac{2\pi}{3}\right)$

in other words, in the complex plane the "other two cube roots of 1" lie at the angles:

1/3 around the circle, and 2/3 (-1/3) around the unit circle.

You can verify, by direct computation, that if:

$\omega = -\dfrac{1}{2} + i\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$

that $\omega^2 = \overline{\omega}$, and also that:

$x^2 + x + 1 = (x - \omega)(x - \omega^2)$

(remember, complex solutions to a REAL quadratic come in conjugate-pairs).

The situation is quite analogous for the polynomial:

$x^n - 1$

the roots are:

$\cos\left(\dfrac{2k\pi}{n}\right) + i\sin\left(\dfrac{2k\pi}{n}\right)$

for $k = 0,1,2,\dots,n$.

For $n = 4$ (the fourth roots of 1), we get:

for $k = 0,\ \cos(0) + i\sin(0) = 1 + i0 = 1$.

for $k = 1,\ \cos\left(\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right) + i\sin\left(\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right) = 0 + i1 = i$

for $k = 2,\ \cos(\pi) + i\sin(\pi) = -1 + i0 = -1$

for $k = 3.\ \cos\left(\dfrac{3\pi}{2}\right) + i\sin\left(\dfrac{3\pi}{2}\right) = 0 +i(-1) = -i$.

Indeed, we have: $x^4 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)(x^2 - 1) = (x + i)(x - i)(x + 1)(x - 1)$.

It turns out there is a DEEP connection between $n$-th roots of a number, and $\frac{1}{n}$-th of a circle. The geometrical reason for this is that complex multiplication is "part stretching" and "part rotating".

The circle is a profound mathematical object. I cannot stress this enough. In mathematics we have two "big ideas": the line, and the circle. The extrapolation of these two simple things, leads to a vast array of interesting structures.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top