Why are the entries in the matrix arranged the way they are?

Click For Summary
The arrangement of entries in a matrix is determined by the choice of ordered bases for the vector spaces involved. Each entry corresponds to the transformation of basis vectors, with the position in the matrix reflecting the specific basis order. If the order of the basis vectors is changed, the corresponding rows and columns in the matrix also change. In the discussed vector space, there are two possible arrangements based on the two ordered bases available. Understanding this rule clarifies why certain entries are positioned as they are in the matrix representation.
M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
Heyy!

Please check the attachment and explain why are they arranged (the matrix entries) the way they are?
I mean, what is the rule for building up a matrix?
In other words, why did not we start with <-1/2, -1/2 l S^2 l -1/2, -1/2 > and placed it as being the first entry?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2013-01-26-14-15-34-1112616259.png
    Screenshot_2013-01-26-14-15-34-1112616259.png
    7.6 KB · Views: 471
Physics news on Phys.org
it is represented as
Sxx Sxy
Syx Syy
Sx will denote |++> and Sy as |+->
 
I see thanks for your reply, but my question was why? What's the rule for matrix representation? Why isn't it
SyySyx
SxySxx
 
For each linear transformation ##A:U\to V##, and each pair of ordered bases (one for U, one for V), there's a matrix [A] that corresponds to A in the following way: Let the number on row i, column j of [A] be ##(Au_j)_i##. Here ##u_j## is the jth member of the given ordered basis for U, and ##(Au_j)_i## is the ith component of the vector ##Au_j##, in the given ordered basis for V.

If you change the order of the basis vectors, you will also change the order of the rows or columns of the matrix. Suppose e.g. that you swap the 3rd and the 5th member of the ordered basis for U. This swaps the 3rd and the 5th column of [A].

If U=V, then it's convenient to choose the two ordered bases to be the same. Then we can talk about the matrix of A with respect to one ordered basis, instead of two. You seem to be dealing with a vector space that's spanned by the basis
$$\left\{\left|\frac 1 2,\frac 1 2\right\rangle,\left|\frac 1 2,-\frac 1 2\right\rangle\right\}.$$ Since there are exactly two ordered bases that consist of these two vectors, there are exactly two ways to arrange the rows and columns of the matrix. You can choose to use the other one, but then you have to make the corresponding change in the 2×1 matrices that represent members of the vector space.
 
Last edited:
Oh, okay thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
886
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K