Why Are the Space-Like Components of the 4-Acceleration Non-Zero in the IRF?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lorna
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 3K views
Lorna
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I read in my textbook that "in the instantanuous reference frame (IRF) [tex][u^{'\gamma}]=(c,\overline{0})[/tex] imply that the components of the 4-acceleration in the IRF are [tex][a^{'\gamma}]=(0,\overline{a'})[/tex]"

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know why they got a' for the space-like components of the 4-acceleration. Isn't the accelaration = du/d[tex]\tau[/tex] if so then using [tex][u^{'\gamma}=(c,\overline{0})[/tex] we get zero for both the time-like and space-like components of the 4-acceleration.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think back to first-year calculus, and suppose [itex]f\left(x\right) = x^3[/itex]. Then, [itex]f\left(2\right) = 8[/itex], and [itex]8[/itex] is a constant, so

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}8 = 0,[/tex]

but

[tex]\frac{df}{dx}\left(2) = 12 \ne 0.[/tex]

Just because the 4-velocity has a particular value (which could have zero spatial part) in a particular frame at a particular instant doesn't mean that the 4-velocity is constant. If the 4-velocity is not constant, then the 4-acceleration doesn't have to be zero.

Throw a ball in the air. When the ball reaches its greatest height, its (spatial) velocity is zero, but its (spatial) acceleration still has magnitude [itex]g[/itex]
 
In addition, note that the 4-acceleration of a particle is orthogonal to its 4-velocity. (Why?)
 
Last edited:
That example was very helpful. thanks a lot.

Thanks robphy too.