Why Are the Space-Like Components of the 4-Acceleration Non-Zero in the IRF?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lorna
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of 4-acceleration in the context of special relativity, specifically within the instantaneous reference frame (IRF). Participants are examining why the space-like components of the 4-acceleration are non-zero despite the 4-velocity having a specific form in the IRF.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the reasoning behind the non-zero space-like components of the 4-acceleration, suggesting that if acceleration is defined as the change in 4-velocity over proper time, both components should be zero. Other participants introduce analogies from calculus and physics to illustrate that a non-constant 4-velocity can lead to non-zero 4-acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring various interpretations of the relationship between 4-velocity and 4-acceleration. Some participants have provided analogies and clarifications that may help guide understanding, but there is no explicit consensus on the original poster's concerns.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the nature of 4-velocity and its implications for 4-acceleration, particularly in the context of instantaneous reference frames. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the conditions under which these quantities are defined.

Lorna
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I read in my textbook that "in the instantanuous reference frame (IRF) [tex][u^{'\gamma}]=(c,\overline{0})[/tex] imply that the components of the 4-acceleration in the IRF are [tex][a^{'\gamma}]=(0,\overline{a'})[/tex]"

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know why they got a' for the space-like components of the 4-acceleration. Isn't the accelaration = du/d[tex]\tau[/tex] if so then using [tex][u^{'\gamma}=(c,\overline{0})[/tex] we get zero for both the time-like and space-like components of the 4-acceleration.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think back to first-year calculus, and suppose [itex]f\left(x\right) = x^3[/itex]. Then, [itex]f\left(2\right) = 8[/itex], and [itex]8[/itex] is a constant, so

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}8 = 0,[/tex]

but

[tex]\frac{df}{dx}\left(2) = 12 \ne 0.[/tex]

Just because the 4-velocity has a particular value (which could have zero spatial part) in a particular frame at a particular instant doesn't mean that the 4-velocity is constant. If the 4-velocity is not constant, then the 4-acceleration doesn't have to be zero.

Throw a ball in the air. When the ball reaches its greatest height, its (spatial) velocity is zero, but its (spatial) acceleration still has magnitude [itex]g[/itex]
 
In addition, note that the 4-acceleration of a particle is orthogonal to its 4-velocity. (Why?)
 
Last edited:
That example was very helpful. thanks a lot.

Thanks robphy too.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K