Why are there different rate constants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluepen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Rate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the rate constant (k) for a first-order decomposition reaction of substance A. Two different calculations yield k values of 0.0998 min-1 and 0.100 min-1 based on concentration data collected at various time intervals. The discrepancy is attributed to experimental error in measuring concentrations, with a noted 0.2% error considered negligible in typical experimental contexts. This highlights the importance of precision in kinetic measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first-order reaction kinetics
  • Familiarity with the Arrhenius equation
  • Basic knowledge of concentration-time data analysis
  • Experience with error analysis in experimental chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Arrhenius equation and its application in reaction kinetics
  • Learn about error propagation in experimental measurements
  • Explore advanced techniques for measuring reaction rates
  • Investigate the impact of temperature on reaction rate constants
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, laboratory technicians, and researchers involved in kinetic studies and reaction mechanism analysis will benefit from this discussion.

bluepen
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey,

The decomposition of A is first order, and [A] is monitored. The following data are recorded:
t / min 0 1 2 4
[A]/[M] 0.100 0.0905 0.0819 0.0670

Calculate k.

Using [A] = [A]0e-kt,

Calculating at t = 1
0.0905 = 0.1e-k(1)
0.905 = e-k
-0.0998=-k
k = 0.0998 min-1

Calculating at t = 4
0.0670 = 0.1e-k(4)
0.67 = e-k(4)
k = 0.100 min-1

How can this be!? :confused:
The question is an example from http://http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c123/intratel.html"

Thanks,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Experimental error in measuring the concentration? 0.1 and 0.0998 aren't that far apart.
 
In most experiments I would consider 0.1 and 0.0998 to be the same - 0.2% error is relatively small.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K