Why are there so many computer languages?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mech-eng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons for the existence of numerous computer programming languages. Participants explore the significance of various languages, their applications, and the implications of having many versus a few dominant languages.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that only a few languages, such as C, C++, Java, and Visual Basic, are essential, while others question which specific languages should be prioritized or eliminated.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of MATLAB for Mechanical Engineering, questioning its classification as a programming language.
  • There is a discussion about the relevance of Assembly language, with some participants asserting its significance in embedded systems programming.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the necessity of many programming languages, drawing analogies to spoken languages and suggesting that fewer languages could suffice.
  • Others argue that the diversity of programming languages arises from their different strengths, weaknesses, and specialized applications, indicating that no single language can meet all needs.
  • Participants mention that new languages continue to emerge while older ones remain in use, citing examples like Go and Dart developed by Google.
  • There is a challenge to the notion that there is only one artificial human language, with references to constructed languages and the artificial nature of all human languages.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the necessity and importance of various programming languages, with no consensus reached on which languages should be considered essential or which could be eliminated.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with programming languages, leading to differing opinions on their importance and relevance. Some statements reflect personal feelings rather than evidence-based arguments.

mech-eng
Messages
826
Reaction score
13
Why are there too much computer language? I think 3 or 4 are the most important ones.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ISamson
Computer science news on Phys.org
mech-eng said:
I think 3 or 4 are the most important ones.
Which 3 or 4 exactly? And why?

Which ones would you recommend dropping from the long list?
 
berkeman said:
Which 3 or 4 exactly? And why?

Which ones would you recommend dropping from the long list?

I don't know but it was just a feeling. Most people mentions C, C++, Java and Visual Basic.

Thank you.
 
mech-eng said:
Most people mentions C, C++, Java and Visual Basic.
But being a Mechanical Engineering major, I would have expected you to mention MATLAB in the list of most important computer programming languages.

(Quiz Question -- Why?) :smile:

And surely Assembly language must be pretty important, no?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mech-eng
mech-eng said:
Whye are there too much computer language? I think 3 or 4 are the most important ones.
Maybe we should only have 3-4 spoken languages too? How do you feel about being restricted to english, spanish, and mandarin?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ISamson and StoneTemplePython
mech-eng said:
Whye are there too much computer language?

That's awfully judgemental, don't you think?

mech-eng said:
but it was just a feeling.

Particularly without evidence.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
How do you feel about being restricted to english, spanish, and mandarin?

Better than, um, xhosa, hmong and navaho!
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Better than, um, xhosa, hmong and navaho!
Actually those sound quite fascinating! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
Greg Bernhardt said:
Maybe we should only have 3-4 spoken languages too? How do you feel about being restricted to english, spanish, and mandarin?

They are very different things. Human languages based on nations they were alreayd existed but requirement of too much computer language for development or technology seems to me very different. They are artificial and there is only one artificial human language. With respect to foreign human languages most of the world learn English, Spanish, German, Italian and nowadays might be Mandarin which is somehow similar what I said in #1.
 
  • #10
berkeman said:
But being a Mechanical Engineering major, I would have expected you to mention MATLAB in the list of most important computer programming languages.

(Quiz Question -- Why?) :smile:

And surely Assembly language must be pretty important, no?

Can Matlab be classified as a programming/computer language because isn't it already written by C or C++, not it a mathematic packed program? (I don't know the difference C and C++and if there is C+?)

Assembly Language? I had never heard of it until you have introduced here. Do you mean engineering drawing or techical drawing or engineering graphics (there are several names)? It might be assumed as a language with some respects.

Thank you.
 
  • #11
mech-eng said:
Can Matlab be classified as a programming/computer language
Of course! We use it all the time for some very complicated work. As an ME, you should learn it.
mech-eng said:
Assembly Language? I had never heard of it until you have introduced here. Do you mean engineering drawing or techical drawing or engineering graphics (there are several names)?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_language
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mech-eng
  • #12
mech-eng said:
Assembly Language? I had never heard of it until you have introduced here.
This CLEARLY indicates that you do not know enough about computers to make a meaningful judgement about how many languages there should be.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NTL2009, Asymptotic and berkeman
  • #13
phinds said:
This CLEARLY indicates that you do not know enough about computers to make a meaningful judgement about how many languages there should be.

I had heard of it literally as "machine language" in my native but I haven't seen nobody interested in it. I might open a new thread based on it and its importance to some fields. I don't have too much info about programming languages and their importance and their use.

Thank you.
 
  • #14
mech-eng said:
I had heard of it literally as "machine language" in my native but I haven't seen nobody interested in it.
Machine language is below Assembly Language; they are not the same, IMO. And Assembly language is extremely important, especially in Embedded Systems Programming, which my company focuses on...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
  • #15
mech-eng said:
I had heard of it literally as "machine language" in my native but I haven't seen nobody interested in it. I might open a new thread based on it and its importance to some fields. I don't have too much info about programming languages and their importance and their use.

Thank you.
Check this out:

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/computer-language-primer-part-1/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri, mech-eng and berkeman
  • #16
If you go to: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code, there you will find a site dedicated to showing how to do something (an algorithm is the term) in many different computer languages. Programmers still create new languages and at the same time use really old ones: FORTRAN, COBOL, C. Sometimes a new language takes off -Julia is an example. Other times they wind up in the language graveyard - Pistol is one for the Amiga back in the mid 1980's.

If a language has a codebase - meaning in this context - people wrote code that is still running now, ones like Jupiter and Ada (not all that common) still count.

Computer languages are generational - meaning that there is family tree kind of thing: Since you seem upset by the number of languages, want to get even more agitated? Try this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_programming_languages
Or try this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_programming_languages
.. darn Pistol was derived from Forth.. and it is not in either list. I never used it, saw code and passed immediately. It was like postscript out on a date with C.

hmm... I used to code in some of those ancient languages. That must mean I'm really old. sigh.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic, mech-eng and berkeman
  • #17
mech-eng said:
I don't know but it was just a feeling. Most people mentions C, C++, Java and Visual Basic.

Thank you.

I really don't know how VB got in there. (And if C# made it in, I would have becomes suspicious that microsoft is behind this thread)

If you look at a company like Google, you'll see its built around C++, Java and Python. I'd probably throw Javascript in there for general web functionality.

The reality is Google is a big company and various other languages have been developed or seeded by it. It does have 3 (or maybe 4) core languages though.
 
  • #18
StoneTemplePython said:
The reality is Google is a big company and various other languages have been developed or seeded by it.
Such as ?
 
  • #19
phinds said:
Such as ?
Go and Dart were developed at Google. Julia is more tied in with MIT but has gotten some seeding from Google.
 
  • #20
Greg Bernhardt said:
Maybe we should only have 3-4 spoken languages too? How do you feel about being restricted to english, spanish, and mandarin?

This was not still a basic and simple explanation for the question.

Thank you.
 
  • #21
There are general purpose languages and a wide variety of specialized languages. They have different strengths and weaknesses that arise from trade-offs made when they were designed. Some are faster, others are easier to learn and program. Some give the programmer full authority while others are very conservative for safety reasons. Some are targeted to specific applications like graphic displays, mathematics, discrete simulation, statistics, graphic design, symbolic manipulation, theorem proving, etc., etc., etc.

Because no one language can be perfect in all aspects, there are many extreme trade-offs that make some languages much better for particular applications than others. That's just the way it is with the current state of the art. Your desire to consolidate and reduce the number of languages is almost universally shared. Many languages are gradually being used less often. But there are still strong reasons for a multitude of languages.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri, Asymptotic, symbolipoint and 1 other person
  • #22
StoneTemplePython said:
Go and Dart were developed at Google. Julia is more tied in with MIT but has gotten some seeding from Google.
Good to know. Thanks.
 
  • #23
mech-eng said:
there is only one artificial human language

And where did you get that? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_constructed_languages
(Neglecting the point that all human languages are artificial - made by people, and not found lying on the ground)

Here's the thing about science. Everybody doesn't get their own opinion. It's not like "I don't like broccoli". In science, opinion has to be informed, and in tghis thread, you've written a lot of uninformed opinions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
  • #24
Vanadium 50 said:
And where did you get that? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_constructed_languages
(Neglecting the point that all human languages are artificial - made by people, and not found lying on the ground)

Here's the thing about science. Everybody doesn't get their own opinion. It's not like "I don't like broccoli". In science, opinion has to be informed, and in tghis thread, you've written a lot of unformed opinions.

But this is a forum and we might discuss something even though we have wrong information. This question had not been asked until this thread I hesitated to asked but I asked. I think still there is nothing wrong.

Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
  • #25
mech-eng said:
But this is a forum and we might discuss something even though we have wrong information. This question had not been asked until this thread I hesitated to asked but I asked. I think still there is nothing wrong.

Thank you.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with asking a question. That's not what Vanadium said. What he SAID, and I agree, is that you went beyond asking a question and expressed opinions that are based on little to no knowledge and that's not a great idea on a hard science forum.
 
  • #26
phinds said:
There is absolutely nothing wrong with asking a question. That's not what Vanadium said. What he SAID, and I agree, is that you went beyond asking a question and expressed opinions that are based on little to no knowledge and that's not a great idea on a hard science forum.

Yes, I assume the question was amateurish or ridiculous but are all people educated in computer science or know a lot of thing about it. This question might add something to ordinary people such as me.
 
  • #27
mech-eng said:
Yes, I assume the question was amateurish or ridiculous but are all people educated in computer science or know a lot of thing about it. This question might add something to ordinary people such as me.
Again, the issue is NOT the question, it is the opinionated formulation of the question. Had you just asked "why are there so many computer languages" all would have been well, but you didn't do that. You made an uninformed value judgement that there are too many languages.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NTL2009
  • #28
phinds said:
Again, the issue is NOT the question, it is the opinionated formulation of the question. Had you just asked "why are they so many computer languages" all would have been well, but you didn't do that. You made an uninformed value judgement that there are too many languages.

Yes, I chose wrong words. I wanted to ask actually so many but the number for me is also too many. Yes this is an opinion I didn't realized so. For somebody number might be too less. But it is whether "too many" or "so many" does not they convey very similar idea here? And there is an negative effect of being non native when using words. May I change the title?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
mech-eng said:
Yes, I chose wrong words. I wanted to ask actually so many but the number for me is also too many. Yes this is an opinion I didn't realized so. For somebody number might be too less. But it is whether "too many" or "so many" does not they convey very similar idea here? And there is an negative effect of being non native when using words. May I change the title?

Thank you.
Well, whatever your native language is, you speak English WAY better than I speak that language :smile:
 
  • #30
mech-eng said:
May I change the title?
You can ask a mentor to do that (you can't do it) but I think it's too late now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
7K