Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why can proteins be considered as bionanomachines when

  1. Apr 24, 2015 #1
    ... something else (?) does the work.

    For example:

    YIOOYys.jpg

    For translocation the protein get unfolded and refolded when it gets to the other side of the membrane, but shouldn't the thing doing the work be considered the "machine". In our class the title was "The role of proteins as 'machines' in cellular processes" but in the above diagram they dont seem to be doing work.

    Unless it is unfolding and refolding itself, or the thing doing the tranlocation is a protein itself. I'm a bit confused by the wording of machines to the protein.

    If anyone could shed some light it would be appreciated.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 24, 2015 #2
    Proteins have a role in a vast range of biological activity.
    For example many of them are enzymes and are necessary catalysts for other chemistry to occur.
    Some proteins play a specific role in DNA replication.
    I think both of those can be considered as having performed work.
     
  4. Apr 24, 2015 #3
    Many thanks for the reply. I see, but could you (or anyone) suggest a reason for the above image being under the heading "The role of proteins as 'machines' in cellular processes"?
     
  5. Apr 24, 2015 #4
    One thing shown in the diagram is the ATP-ADP cycle.
    This chemistry is basically delivering fuel (energy) to some process.
    Where energy is being supplied to some process in order for it happen, then work is being performed.
    Anything which does work is analagous to a machine, but as with any analogy it's just an attempt at visualisation, and not a good idea to think of it too literally.
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2015
  6. Apr 24, 2015 #5
    A secondary active transporter undergoes major conformational changes to transport something, changing from an outward facing to inward facing state, in the former case accepting the ligand and in the latter case expelling it into the cell (or out of it, the process can be reversed). The actual change in configuration of the protein allows the passage of say, an ion or a sugar.

    Conformational fluctuations are also a component of enzyme function. The hypothesis for one enzyme I studied is that it anchors the components in place and/or maneuvers them into position, thus facilitating the reaction.
     
  7. Apr 25, 2015 #6
    I think i see where this is going, the proteins are effectively part of a machine / mechanism. Analogous to pistons being part of an engine.

    Thanks for the replies, I don't understand some of what you are saying as I'm really not a biologist but it gives me something to work from, thanks.
     
  8. Apr 25, 2015 #7

    Ygggdrasil

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    In terms of protein translocation, it takes work to move a protein directionally across a membrane against its concentration gradient (such a process is associated with an increase in free energy of the system). In some cases, this process occurs via a "Brownian Ratchet" mechanism. Unfolded proteins (but not folded proteins) are free to diffuse either way across the membrane though the Sec61 pore, but on one side of the membrane, there are chaperone proteins (called BiP) that strongly bind the unfolded protein and prevent them from going back across. This essentially makes transport occur through the membrane in only one direction. After the protein is all the way through the pore, the chaperones help fold the protein so that it can stay in the appropriate membrane compartment and perform its function. The process works because binding and unbinding of the chaperones to the unfolded protein is coupled to ATP hydrolysis (which provides the energy to power the process). Here, although work is being done (moving a substrate against its concentration gradient), the system is not working in an analogous way to macroscopic motors. See the diagram below from this review article for a picture of the "Brownian Ratchet" mechanism.
    bb410021.f3.jpe


    In the case of protein degradation by ClpXP and other similar proteases, the analogy to macroscopic motors is more apt. In these proteins, the motor protein binds to ATP and the conversion of ATP to ADP + Pi changes the shape of the motor protein. This change in shape causes the motor protein to pull its substrate through a small pore in the top of the motor, which mechanically unfolds the protein. These motors are capable of generating quite a bit of force. Other motor proteins, such as DNA helicases work in a similar way, burning fuel (ATP) in order to pull DNA through a central pore. In bacteria, instead of using the "Browinian ratchet" mechanism above to move unfolded proteins through the Sec61 channel, the bacteria use a molecular motor called SecA that burns ATP in order to push the unfolded protein through the Sec61 channel.
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2015
  9. Apr 26, 2015 #8
    Thanks! It's very clever indeed. Biology on my physics course has never really interested me but it's little things like this that give me hope that there are some interesting "physicsy" mechanical biological processes out there.
     
  10. Apr 27, 2015 #9
    Have a look into modern biophysics research, I think you'll find that biology is a vast repository of great physics and physics-like problems.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook