Why can the ##1##-point correlation function be made to vanish?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which the 1-point correlation function in quantum field theory can be made to vanish through a suitable transformation of the field. Participants explore the implications of field rescaling and the role of vacuum states in this context, referencing a specific Lagrangian and the concept of saddlepoint solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the 1-point correlation function can be made to vanish by rescaling the field, seeking criteria for determining the appropriate value of the field that achieves this.
  • Another participant suggests examining the saddlepoint solution from the path integral perspective, indicating that shifting the field relates to expanding around different vacua.
  • Several participants challenge the expression provided for the 1-point correlation function, indicating it should only involve a single point, and provide references to clarify this point.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of expanding around vacua, questioning whether this leads to a new constant term in the Lagrangian and how it might affect correlation functions.
  • One participant introduces the idea of explicitly choosing a ground state and the consequences of symmetry breaking, particularly in the context of effective theories.
  • A later reply clarifies that the 1-point correlation function is the vacuum expectation value of the field and suggests that subtracting this value results in a shifted field operator with a vanishing expectation value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correct formulation of the 1-point correlation function and its implications. There is no consensus on the effects of constant terms introduced by shifting the field or the nature of vacuum states in relation to correlation functions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific equations and concepts from external sources, indicating potential limitations in the discussion's clarity and completeness. The discussion also highlights the dependence on definitions of correlation functions and the subtleties involved in field transformations.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
The ##1##-point correlation function in any theory, free or interacting, can be made to vanish by a suitable rescaling of the field ##\phi##.

I would like to understand this statement.

With the above goal in mind, consider the following theory:

$$\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}\left((\partial\phi)^{2}-m^{2}\phi^{2}\right)+\frac{g}{2}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi\partial_{\mu}\phi.$$

What criteria (on the Lagrangian ##\mathcal{L}##) is used to determine the value of the field ##\phi_{0}## such that the transformation ##\phi \rightarrow \phi + \phi_{0}## leads to a vanishing ##1##-point correlation function ##\displaystyle{\langle \Omega | T\{\phi(x_{1}\phi(x_{2})\}| \Omega \rangle}##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should look at the saddlepoint solution for the field from the path integral. When they mean shift the field it corresponds to expanding about the different vaccua.
 
radium said:
You should look at the saddlepoint solution for the field from the path integral. When they mean shift the field it corresponds to expanding about the different vaccua.

Right!

When you expand about the vacua, shouldn't you get a new constant term in the Lagrangian?

Doesn't this constant term affect the correlation functions?
 
Well I think you are referring to explicitly choosing a ground state writing an effective theory in term of fluctuations about the new ground state. This would correspond to picking a phase for a complex scalar with U(1) symmetry breaking for example (an effective theory for a superfluid). Once you have chosen this vacuum you must stick with your choice since the ground state is no longer invariant under whatever symmetry (remember the action still is, the spontaneous symmetry breaking is because \langle \phi \rangle \neq 0 for certain values of the parameters.
 
A 1-point correlation function is simply the vacuum expectation value of the field. Subtract this expectation value from the field operator, and you get a shifted (not a rescaled!) field operator whose vacuum expectation value vanishes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K