Why can we show that an other polynomial is irreducible?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The polynomial $f(x)=10x^4-18x^3+4x^2+7x+16$ is proven to be irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ by demonstrating its irreducibility in $\mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. Using the ring homomorphism $\widetilde{ \phi }: \mathbb{Z}[x] \to \mathbb{Z}_3[X]$ with $m=3$, it is shown that $f(x)$ does not factor into lower-degree polynomials in $\mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. Consequently, by Gauss's lemma, the irreducibility in $\mathbb{Z}$ follows, confirming that $f(x)$ is also irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial rings, specifically $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ and $\mathbb{Q}[x]$.
  • Knowledge of ring homomorphisms and their properties.
  • Familiarity with irreducibility criteria in algebra, particularly over finite fields.
  • Basic understanding of Gauss's lemma in the context of polynomial factorization.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ring homomorphisms, particularly $\widetilde{ \phi }: \mathbb{Z}[x] \to \mathbb{Z}_m[X]$.
  • Learn about irreducibility tests for polynomials over finite fields, focusing on $\mathbb{Z}_3[x]$.
  • Explore Gauss's lemma and its implications for polynomial irreducibility in number theory.
  • Investigate other methods for proving polynomial irreducibility, such as Eisenstein's criterion.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and researchers interested in polynomial theory, particularly those focusing on irreducibility and number theory.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! :)
I am looking at the exercise:

Prove that $f(x)=10x^4-18x^3+4x^2+7x+16 \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$.

According to my notes,a way to do this is the following:

We know that $\forall m>1 \exists $ ring homomorphism $\widetilde{ \phi }: \mathbb{Z}[x] \to \mathbb{Z}_m[X]$. We choose a prime $m$,that does not divide the coefficient of the highest degree of the terms.A logic choice is $m=3$.So, if $f(x)=g(x) \cdot h(x), g(x),h(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$,then $\widetilde{ \phi }(f(x))=\widetilde{ \phi }(g(x)) \cdot \widetilde{ \phi }(h(x))$.

$\widetilde{ \phi }(f(x))=x^4+x^2+x+1= \text{ the product of two non-zero polynomial of } \mathbb{Z}_3[x]$

We have $2$ cases:
  • $x^4+x^2+x+1=\text{ polynomial of degree } 1 \cdot \text{ polynomial of degree } 3$
  • $x^4+x^2+x+1= (ax^2+bx+c) \cdot (a'x^2+b'x+c')$

First case:

Is means that there is a root in $\mathbb{Z}_3$:

$[a]x+, [a] \neq [0] \Rightarrow \text{ root }: [a]^{-1}$.-> Why is $[a]^{-1}$ the root and not $[-b][a]^{-1}$ ?So,we have to check if one of $0,1,2 \in \mathbb{Z}_3$ is a root and we conclude that none of these numbers are roots,so the first case is rejected.

Second case:

$$\left\{\begin{matrix}
x^4: & 1=aa' \\
x^3: & 0=ab'+ba' \\
x^2: & 1=ac'+a'c+bb' \\
x: & 1=bc'+cb' \\
\text{ constant: } & 1=cc'
\end{matrix}\right.$$

$a=a'=1 \text{ or } 2$ and $c=c'=1 \text{ or } 2 $

We get the relations $b+b'=0$ & $c(b+b')=1$ that can't be true.

So,the second case is also rejected.
-> But...why if we have shown that $x^4+x^2+x+1$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Z}_3 $,have we proven that $f(x)=10x^4-18x^3+4x^2+7x+16 \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Z}$ ,and so also in $\mathbb{Q}$? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
$[a]x+, [a] \neq [0] \Rightarrow \text{ root }: [a]^{-1}$.-> Why is $[a]^{-1}$ the root and not $[-b][a]^{-1}$ ?

You are right, it should be $[-b][a]^{-1}$ (but that does not affect the overall argument).

evinda said:
-> But...why if we have shown that $x^4+x^2+x+1$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Z}_3 $,have we proven that $f(x)=10x^4-18x^3+4x^2+7x+16 \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Z}$ ,and so also in $\mathbb{Q}$? :confused:
If there was a factorisation in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ then by reducing all the coefficients mod 3 you would get a factorisation in $\mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. Since you have shown that there is no such factorisation it follows that the polynomial is irreducible over $\mathbb{Z}$, and hence (by Gauss's lemma) also over $\mathbb{Q}$.
 
Opalg said:
You are right, it should be $[-b][a]^{-1}$ (but that does not affect the overall argument).If there was a factorisation in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ then by reducing all the coefficients mod 3 you would get a factorisation in $\mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. Since you have shown that there is no such factorisation it follows that the polynomial is irreducible over $\mathbb{Z}$, and hence (by Gauss's lemma) also over $\mathbb{Q}$.

Ok,thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
932
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K