- #1

chill_factor

- 901

- 5

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1111/1111.3873.pdf

Is there any particular reason why the universe cannot have a net angular momentum? If it did indeed have a net angular momentum are there any consequences of that?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter chill_factor
- Start date

- #1

chill_factor

- 901

- 5

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1111/1111.3873.pdf

Is there any particular reason why the universe cannot have a net angular momentum? If it did indeed have a net angular momentum are there any consequences of that?

- #2

ImaLooser

- 489

- 3

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1111/1111.3873.pdf

Is there any particular reason why the universe cannot have a net angular momentum? If it did indeed have a net angular momentum are there any consequences of that?

Kurt Godel found a solution of Einstein's GR equations in which the universe was rotating. Each point has an equal claim for being the center. In such a universe time travel is theoretically possible. Observations show that our Universe does not rotate in such a way.

- #3

chill_factor

- 901

- 5

- #4

ImaLooser

- 489

- 3

That is a sum of local rotations, not a global rotation. You could say is is a net angular momentum. It is not a terribly firm result though, and I'd forgotten about it.

- #5

Chronos

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 11,435

- 748

- #6

chill_factor

- 901

- 5

- #7

Chronos

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 11,435

- 748

- #8

marty1

- 81

- 0

I did laugh when I read that. That is funny.

I suppose what they would mean is that if you are stationary at the edge you would have an error between the total gravity you feel toward the center compared to measuring all the mass in the universe and doing the calculation on paper.

- #9

- 6,723

- 426

We have a FAQ about this: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=506988 [Broken]

It doesn't make sense to describe it as having a (zero or nonzero) angular momentum, because angular momentum isn't defined or conserved globally in GR. You can describe it as having a zero or nonzero angular velocity.

It doesn't make sense to describe it as having a (zero or nonzero) angular momentum, because angular momentum isn't defined or conserved globally in GR. You can describe it as having a zero or nonzero angular velocity.

Last edited by a moderator:

- #10

Chronos

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 11,435

- 748

There is also a thread on this - https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=217956

Share:

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 610

- Replies
- 40

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 756

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 166

- Last Post

- Replies
- 21

- Views
- 511

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 641

- Last Post

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 489

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 471

- Last Post

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 601