fxdung
- 387
- 23
Why can't we interprete /x> in relativistic QFT as position eigenstate?And by the way what is the difference between /x> and /1x>=Phi(field operator)(x)/0>?
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the state |x⟩ in relativistic Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and its distinction from the state |1x⟩ = Φ(field operator)(x)|0⟩. In relativistic QFT, the normalization of the field operator Φ is adjusted to ensure Lorentz invariance, resulting in |1x⟩ being fundamentally different from |x⟩. This difference is highlighted by the fact that the function described in equation (59) of the referenced paper is Lorentz invariant but does not conform to a δ-function representation.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the foundations of Quantum Field Theory and relativistic quantum mechanics.
In non-relativistic QFT it's the same. In relativistic QFT one changes the normalization of ##\phi## so that it becomes Lorentz invariant, the consequence of which is that ##|1x\rangle## differs from ##|x\rangle##. See e.g. myfxdung said:And by the way what is the difference between /x> and /1x>=Phi(field operator)(x)/0>?