Why can't we interprete /x> in relativistic QFT as position eigenfunc?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the state |x⟩ in relativistic Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and its distinction from the state |1x⟩ = Φ(field operator)(x)|0⟩. In relativistic QFT, the normalization of the field operator Φ is adjusted to ensure Lorentz invariance, resulting in |1x⟩ being fundamentally different from |x⟩. This difference is highlighted by the fact that the function described in equation (59) of the referenced paper is Lorentz invariant but does not conform to a δ-function representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with Lorentz invariance in physics
  • Knowledge of field operators in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of eigenstates and eigenfunctions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz invariance in Quantum Field Theory
  • Examine the differences between non-relativistic and relativistic QFT
  • Read the paper referenced (http://de.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0202204) focusing on equations (55)-(60)
  • Explore the mathematical properties of δ-functions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the foundations of Quantum Field Theory and relativistic quantum mechanics.

fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
Why can't we interprete /x> in relativistic QFT as position eigenstate?And by the way what is the difference between /x> and /1x>=Phi(field operator)(x)/0>?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fxdung said:
And by the way what is the difference between /x> and /1x>=Phi(field operator)(x)/0>?
In non-relativistic QFT it's the same. In relativistic QFT one changes the normalization of ##\phi## so that it becomes Lorentz invariant, the consequence of which is that ##|1x\rangle## differs from ##|x\rangle##. See e.g. my
http://de.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0202204
Eqs. (55)-(60). In particular, the function (59) is Lorentz invariant, but is not a ##\delta##-function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K