Why can't we make a space elevator using Quantum Levitation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of constructing a space elevator utilizing quantum levitation, specifically through the use of stacked hollow rings that are quantum locked. Participants explore the theoretical implications of this concept, including the mechanics of magnetic levitation and superconductivity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes the idea of using quantum locked rings to create a flexible space elevator structure that can transport objects via magnetic capsules.
  • Another participant questions the structural integrity of such an elevator, suggesting that the ease of removing a superconductor from a magnet indicates it may not hold together effectively.
  • A third participant seeks clarification on the terms "quantum locked" and "quantum levitation," and raises concerns about the ability of this method to support significant weight.
  • Another participant hypothesizes about increasing energy output to magnets to lift objects, questioning the relationship between the size of the magnetic platform and its lifting capability, as well as the weight characteristics of superconductors in quantum trapping.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and mechanics of using quantum levitation for a space elevator. There is no consensus on the feasibility of the proposed concept, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight uncertainties regarding the definitions of quantum locking and levitation, the structural stability of the proposed design, and the conditions under which superconductors operate. The discussion remains open-ended with unresolved questions about the necessary parameters for effective implementation.

Troy Barnes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why can't we make a space elevator out of separate rings that are stacked over each other through Quantum Levitation?
You know, have hollow rings that are quantum locked over each other, like in this video That way, the ladder freely moves around and changes shape, but would still be "intact". Transporting something would be done by putting it in a magnetic capsule, and then using super conductivity to get it all the way up the ladder? I have zero experience in anything space so bear with me..
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Look how easily you can remove the superconductor from the magnet. I don't think an elevator would hold together.
 
What does "quantum locked" and "quantum levitation" mean? And if you mean magnetic levitation, possibly involving the Meissner effect, what makes you think this supports an arbitrary amount of weight?
 
Hello! Found this thread through interest and some research into the matter.

Isn't it possible to increase the energy output into magnets, and thus you would "push"/"lift" the object upwards? (I personally have no idea, this is merely a hypothetical theory)

There is distance between the superconducting object and the magnetic platform after all... so it is a question of proportions, is it not? How big would you have to build a magnetic platform to be capable of "lifting" something out into space, using this technology? Furthermore, is the superconducting object "weightless" in the state of quantum trapping/locking?

If, for instance, we say that we have a superconducting object hovering above 1 square meters of a magnetic platform, and there's 100 square meters underground/under a door/surface/gate. Would the magnetic force be greater if one would open the gate 1 square meter? Or 2 square meters? Would it cause the superconducting object to rise, or would it stay "locked" in position?

EDIT: I would suggest checking out more information about the matter on TEDTalks with Boaz Almog.
http://www.ted.com/talks/boaz_almog_levitates_a_superconductor#
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
749