Undergrad Why charge density of moving dipole is dependent on time?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the time-dependent charge density of a moving electric dipole, addressing inconsistencies in transformation equations. It highlights that the electric current from a moving dipole can be expressed as a combination of polarization and magnetization currents, leading to a varying magnetic field. The charge distribution is not constant over time due to the dipole's movement, as indicated by the relevant equation. Additionally, there is curiosity about the author's affiliation with NIOSH, which seems unusual in this context. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how motion affects charge density in electromagnetic theory.
Lokesh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Here is the link to the paper: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4712308
This paper aims to resolve the inconsistency between different transformation equations by expressing the electric current created by a moving electric dipole as the sum of polarization and magnetization currents and calculating the resulting magnetic field. Here they take
charge density to be dependent on time. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

I don't want to spend $ 40 to purchase access to the article. Is it perhaps the same as this one ?

In that case equation ##(5)## answers your question:$$\rho_b({\bf r},t)=-{\bf\nabla\cdot P}({\bf r},t)=-{\bf p}_0{\bf \nabla}\delta({\bf r}-{\bf r}_0(t))$$the dipole is moving, so the charge distribution in space is not constant in time.

##\ ##
 
And why is the author of that paper from NIOSH? That's weird...
 
berkeman said:
And why is the author of that paper from NIOSH? That's weird...
IMG_0071.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and berkeman
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
936
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K