On the magnetic dipole radiation in Griffith's book

• a1titude
In summary, the conversation discusses the appearance of magnetic dipole radiation in section 11.1.3 of Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics 4Ed" and the resultant equation which shows that there is no magnetic field in the axis of a wire loop when theta=0. However, the person is missing the fact that although the magnetic flux density is at maximum value there, it is time-varying due to the alternating current. This is because Griffiths is considering a radiating, harmonically oscillating current loop, leading to slower decreasing "radiation terms" in the fields. Working problem 11.5 on page 477 may help clarify this concept.
a1titude
Homework Statement
It's not a homework. I just saw the resultant equation to find that it's strange.
Relevant Equations
$$\mathbf{B} = \mathbf{\nabla} \times \mathbf{A} = - \frac {\mu_0 m_0 \omega^2} {4 \pi c^2} \left( \frac {\sin \theta} {r} \right) \cos [\omega (t - r/c)] \hat{\mathbf{\theta}}$$
In 11.1.3 of Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics 4Ed" appears magnetic dipole radiation, which results in the equation above. According to the resultant equation, there is no magnetic field in the axis of the wire loop because theta=0. However, I think the magnetic flux density is at maximum value there although its time-varying due to the alternating current. What am I missing now? Thanks for your concerns in advance.

Attachments

• b.png
25.9 KB · Views: 84
• a.png
15.7 KB · Views: 68
a1titude said:
In 11.1.3 of Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics 4Ed" appears magnetic dipole radiation, which results in the equation above. According to the resultant equation, there is no magnetic field in the axis of the wire loop because theta=0. However, I think the magnetic flux density is at maximum value there although its time-varying due to the alternating current. What am I missing now? Thanks for your concerns in advance.
For a time-independent current loop, the B-field is strongest for ##\theta = 0## (for a given ##r##), as you are thinking. But recall that the field falls off rapidly with distance as ##1/r^3##.

In Griffiths' calculation in section 11.1.3, he is considering a radiating, harmonically oscillating current loop. In this case, you get "radiation terms" in the results for B and E that decrease much more slowly with distance as ##1/r##. So for "large ##r##", only the radiation terms are significant. Note, in particular, Griffiths' "approximation 3" given as relation (11.34) on page 475; namely, assume ##r \gg c/\omega##.

It would probably be helpful for you to work problem 11.5 on page 477 (at least the first part where you are asked to find the fields without making approximation 3.)

hutchphd, vanhees71, PeroK and 1 other person

Replies
4
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
375
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
497
Replies
1
Views
2K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
937
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
27
Views
1K