Undergrad Why choose traceless matrices as basis?

Click For Summary
Traceless Hermitian matrices, such as the Pauli matrices, are commonly chosen as a basis for SU(2) due to their mathematical properties. These matrices are skew-Hermitian, which is a requirement for unitary matrices, and traceless, which ensures a determinant of one. The discussion highlights that the derivative of the unitary condition leads to the conclusion that the trace must equal zero. Additionally, the determinant condition reinforces the necessity of traceless matrices in this context. Understanding these properties is crucial for the representation theory of SU(2) and its applications in physics.
phoenix95
Gold Member
Messages
81
Reaction score
23
While writing down the basis for SU(2), physicists often choose traceless hermitian matrices as such, often the Pauli matrices. Why is this? In particular why traceless, and why hermitian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Skew-Hermitian is a consequence of unitary, traceless of determinant one:
$$
U^\dagger U = I \Longrightarrow D(U^\dagger U) = U^\dagger \cdot I + I \cdot U = U^\dagger + U = D(I) = 0\\
\det U = 1 \Longrightarrow D(\det U) = \operatorname{tr}U = D(1) = 0
$$
Here's the computation for the determinant in detail:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/pantheon-derivatives-part-iv/
and here are some remarks on ##\operatorname{SU}(2)##:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/representations-precision-important/
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/journey-manifold-su2-part-ii/
 
  • Like
Likes phoenix95
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K