Why did I make this error?What is the error in my equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum and energy in a scenario involving a photon striking a stationary solar sail. Participants are analyzing the algebraic manipulations related to momentum and kinetic energy equations, questioning the validity of the results derived from these equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of momentum and energy, noting discrepancies in the original poster's calculations. There are questions about the treatment of momentum direction and the correct expression for photon momentum. Some participants suggest that the change in momentum should be considered as a sum rather than a difference due to the reflection of the photon.

Discussion Status

There is active engagement with various interpretations of the equations presented. Some participants provide clarifications regarding the correct formulas for momentum and energy, while others express confusion about the original poster's reasoning. Guidance has been offered regarding the need to account for direction in momentum calculations and the proper use of mass in the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of relativistic momentum and energy conservation, with specific attention to the assumptions made about the photon and the solar sail. The discussion highlights potential misunderstandings in the application of physical principles and mathematical operations.

JoAuSc
Messages
197
Reaction score
1
The problem is that I'm doing what seems to be perfectly reasonable algebra but I'm getting a result that makes no sense.

Let's say a photon travels from the left and hits a stationary solar sail which is perpendicular to the light. There is perfect reflection and a change in momenta for both objects. For momentum we have:

p_iphoton + p_iSS = p_fphoton + p_fSS =>
h/c*nu1 + m*(0)^2 = h/c*nu2 + mv
h/c*(nu1-nu2) = mv

energy:

KE_iphoton + KE_iSS = KE_fphoton + KE_fSS
h*nu1 + 0 = h*nu2 + mv^2
h*(nu1-nu2) = mv^2 = c*mv => v = c

(KE_iphoton is the photon's initial kinetic energy, p_iphoton is its initial momentum, KE_fphoton is the final KE, etc.; h = Planck's constant, c = speed of light, m = mass of solar sail, v = final velocity of solar sail, nu1 = initial frequency of photon, nu2 = final frequency of photon.)

Obviously, the final speed of the solar sail isn't the speed of light. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did not take direction into account with your momentum conservation calculation.
 
JoAuSc said:
The problem is that I'm doing what seems to be perfectly reasonable algebra but I'm getting a result that makes no sense.

Let's say a photon travels from the left and hits a stationary solar sail which is perpendicular to the light. There is perfect reflection and a change in momenta for both objects. For momentum we have:

p_iphoton + p_iSS = p_fphoton + p_fSS =>
h/c*nu1 + m*(0)^2 = h/c*nu2 + mv
h/c*(nu1-nu2) = mv
As Andrevh pointed out, the change in momentum is the sum of, not difference of, the magnitudes of the momentum before and after due to the 180 degree change in direction.

Also, you are using [itex]h/c\nu[/itex] for momentum of the photon which is not correct. Momentum of the photon is [itex]E/c = h\nu/c = h/\lambda[/itex].

energy:

KE_iphoton + KE_iSS = KE_fphoton + KE_fSS
h*nu1 + 0 = h*nu2 + mv^2
h*(nu1-nu2) = mv^2 = c*mv => v = c

(KE_iphoton is the photon's initial kinetic energy, p_iphoton is its initial momentum, KE_fphoton is the final KE, etc.; h = Planck's constant, c = speed of light, m = mass of solar sail, v = final velocity of solar sail, nu1 = initial frequency of photon, nu2 = final frequency of photon.)

Obviously, the final speed of the solar sail isn't the speed of light. What did I do wrong?
I don't follow your math here. You have to divide the change in momentum of the photon by the sail's mass to find the speed change in the sail. The m in your equation is the sail's mass not the mass of the photon.

[tex]\Delta P_{ph}/m_s = v_s = P_s/m_s[/tex]

[tex]KE_s = \frac{1}{2}m_sv_s^2 = P_s^2/2m_s[/tex]

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
As Andrevh pointed out, the change in momentum is the sum of, not difference of, the magnitudes of the momentum before and after due to the 180 degree change in direction.
Yes, I see it now. Thank you and Andrevh. I'm guessing you'd have a difference of frequencies in the energy equation, but a sum of frequencies in the momentum equation, so you can't substitute a change in photon energy with a change in photon momentum, at least not like I did.

Andrew Mason said:
Also, you are using [itex]h/c\nu[/itex] for momentum of the photon which is not correct. Momentum of the photon is [itex]E/c = h\nu/c = h/\lambda[/itex].
That's what I had, except that rather than clarify things with parentheses like I should have, I relied on order of operations. I used [itex]h/c*\nu = (h/c)*\nu = (h*\nu)/c.[/itex]

Andrew Mason said:
I don't follow your math here. You have to divide the change in momentum of the photon by the sail's mass to find the speed change in the sail. The m in your equation is the sail's mass not the mass of the photon.

[tex]\Delta P_{ph}/m_s = v_s = P_s/m_s[/tex]

[tex]KE_s = \frac{1}{2}m_sv_s^2 = P_s^2/2m_s[/tex]

AM
Let me clarify. In the last line of equations, I had
[tex]h*(\nu_1-\nu_2) = mv^2 = c*mv => v = c[/tex]
I believe the first two terms are, in fact, equal to each other, right? Now, based on my erroneous assumption that
[tex]\Delta P_{ph} = (h/c) * (\nu_1 - \nu_2)[/tex]
I got
[tex]\Delta P_{ph} = c * \Delta E_{ph}[/itex]<br /> which implies that mv^2 = cmv.[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K