Undergrad Why do dimensions curl up or expand?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trollfaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Dimensions
Click For Summary
In string theory, the universe is theorized to have 9-10 spatial dimensions, with the three we experience resulting from the compactification of higher dimensions. The reasons behind some dimensions curling up or expanding remain unclear, as there is no well-established model explaining this phenomenon. Some suggest that energy may be required for these dimensions to curl up, while others propose that cosmic strings may have prevented expansion during cosmic inflation. Flux compactification is one method used in string theory to stabilize dimensions, but it raises questions about fine-tuning and the specific number of compactified dimensions. Overall, the mechanisms behind dimension behavior in string theory are still an open area of research.
Trollfaz
Messages
143
Reaction score
14
In string theory, the universe can have 9-10 spatial dimensions and the reason why we experience 3 is because those higher dimensions compactify. Under right conditions the extra dimensions can decompactify into the macroscopic dimensions we see. Why do some dimensions curl up or expand? Is energy required to curl up the extra dimensions
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Trollfaz said:
Why do some dimensions curl up or expand?
Happens when they get wet. Fabric of space and all.

The question seems to presuppose that they have a natural size and something causes them to deviate from it - this "cause" you mention. That's not necessarily true.
 
  • Haha
Likes ohwilleke, DennisN and Cepatiti
Trollfaz said:
Under right conditions the extra dimensions can decompactify into the macroscopic dimensions we see. Why do some dimensions curl up or expand? Is energy required to curl up the extra dimensions
Are you referring to this paper: The fate of four dimensions ? Personally, I didn't know that paper. I didn't check, but does it have a lot of follow-up papers?

Some remarks related to your question:

As far as I know, there is no well-established model in string theory explaining why some dimensions are compact and others not.

Another question to ponder is why these compact dimensions remained small during the cosmic inflation. Here I read something in the past about cosmic strings, which stated that during the inflationary epoch, cosmic strings were wrapped around the compact dimensions, thus preventing them from expanding. Unfortunately, I do not have a reference for this anymore.
 
Last edited:
In string theory we compactify by using fluxes of fields. This can already be done in GR with an electromagnetic field. You can compactify one spatial dimension and keep it small by using a flux from the EM-field. But that solution will be unstable.

To me, this flux compactification reeks a bit like fine tuning. And why just 6 dimensions compactified? Nobody knows. People were primarily happy to use the geometry of this 6d spaces to explain features of standard models, and saw the former curse of extra dimensions as a new blessing.
 
Some trolling nonsense has been deleted from the thread and the thread is reopened.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Trollfaz said:
In string theory, the universe can have 9-10 spatial dimensions and the reason why we experience 3 is because those higher dimensions compactify. Under right conditions the extra dimensions can decompactify into the macroscopic dimensions we see. Why do some dimensions curl up or expand? Is energy required to curl up the extra dimensions
The theory has 9-10 spatial dimensions in the first place to motivate the weakness of gravity relative to the Standard Model forces and to allow for mathematical beauty.

The theory has compactified dimensions because we need them to conform to observation.

Alternately, the theory doesn't use compactified dimensions at all, and instead confines Standard Model forces but not gravity to four dimensional branes. This also has the virtue of providing a dumping ground on branes we don't live on for particles and forces that the theory predicts that aren't seen.

But a theoretical motivation or mechanism for compactification is more of a open problem than it is something that there is an answer at the ready to address.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K