Why Do Electrons in Covalent Bonds Not Remain Stationary?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of electrons in covalent bonds, specifically questioning why electrons do not remain stationary despite the attractive forces from the nuclei of bonded atoms. Participants also explore the implications of this behavior on van der Waals bonds and the concept of standing waves in atoms.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why electrons in covalent bonds do not remain stationary, suggesting that the attractive forces should cause them to be fixed at a single point.
  • The same participant expresses confusion about how electrons can form van der Waals bonds through dispersion forces if they are not moving within the atom.
  • Another participant asserts that the classical model of electrons revolving around a nucleus is outdated, introducing the quantum model where electrons are described by probabilities and orbitals.
  • A later reply suggests that understanding atomic orbitals may help clarify the misconceptions about electron behavior.
  • One participant expresses ongoing confusion regarding the concept of standing waves in atoms and requests further explanation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are differing views on the nature of electron behavior in atoms and the validity of classical versus quantum models.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the definitions of terms like "revolve," "stationary," and "standing waves," which may contribute to the misunderstandings expressed by participants. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with quantum mechanics and atomic theory.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in atomic theory, quantum mechanics, and the nature of chemical bonding, particularly those seeking to understand the behavior of electrons in different models.

harjot singh
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
my question is that why electrons revolve in a covalent bonded atom where the force of attraction of the other atom to which electron is shared when put forces of attraction on it.it means that they then should stuck at single point rather than revolving in the atom,my another question related to this fact is that why they then make a van Der walls bond through dispersion forces as electrons will not move i the atom? explain this whole misconception.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
harjot singh said:
my question is that why electrons revolve in a covalent bonded atom where the force of attraction of the other atom to which electron is shared when put forces of attraction on it.it means that they then should stuck at single point rather than revolving in the atom,my another question related to this fact is that why they then make a van Der walls bond through dispersion forces as electrons will not move i the atom? explain this whole misconception.

Welcome to PhysicsForums, Harjot!

Bound electrons do not revolve around a nucleus. That is an outdated atomic model. In the quantum model, there is a probability an electron will be found at a particular spot. The various spots it can possibly be found at together form an orbital.
 
DrChinese said:
Welcome to PhysicsForums, Harjot!

Bound electrons do not revolve around a nucleus. That is an outdated atomic model. In the quantum model, there is a probability an electron will be found at a particular spot. The various spots it can possibly be found at together form an orbital.

but i am still in misconception ,relating to standing waves in atom?pleasezz explain everything about it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K