Shahin.Omar
- 36
- 0
Why revolving bodies have their orbits elliptical and not perfectly circular (please correct me if I am wrong)?
The discussion explores why revolving bodies have elliptical orbits rather than perfectly circular ones, touching on concepts from physics, mathematics, and celestial mechanics. It includes considerations of gravitational forces and the nature of orbits in different contexts, such as satellites and Saturn's rings.
Participants express differing views on the nature of orbits, particularly regarding Saturn's rings and the concept of perfect circular orbits. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.
Participants note the dependence on gravitational force relations and the implications for orbit shapes, but do not resolve the complexities of these relationships or the definitions of circularity.
Is there anything in nature that is perfectly circular? Perfect circles exist in math only.Shahin.Omar said:Why revolving bodies have their orbits elliptical and not perfectly circular (please correct me if I am wrong)?
Vanadium 50 said:Because ellipses (technically, conic sections) are the trajectories of particles in a 1/r potential. If gravity had a different relation of force vs. distance, there would be different shaped orbits.
They don't have one orbit, just individual orbits which are not perfect circles. The average of the individual orbit is closer to the circle but not a perfect circle either.Shahin.Omar said:Saturn's rings are a set of large number of bodies and they together form a perfect circular orbit.
A.T. said:They don't have one orbit, just individual orbits which are not perfect circles. The average of the individual orbit is closer to the circle but not a perfect circle either.