DaveC426913
Gold Member
- 24,001
- 8,158
Not that I'm trying to defend it, just that I have a glimpse into the other side of the argument:
The question could be asked thus: How has science improved us as a people? Does it make us love each other more? Does it make us kill each other less? Does it prevent us from behaving cruelly or destructively towards our ourselves, others, animals, our planet?
People are not finding answers to the meaningful questions in their lives. Thus, valid as science is, for what it does, it has limited application to real life. There are other ways of evaluating life.
(Again, disclaimer: I am only playing Devil's Advocate here.)
The question could be asked thus: How has science improved us as a people? Does it make us love each other more? Does it make us kill each other less? Does it prevent us from behaving cruelly or destructively towards our ourselves, others, animals, our planet?
People are not finding answers to the meaningful questions in their lives. Thus, valid as science is, for what it does, it has limited application to real life. There are other ways of evaluating life.
(Again, disclaimer: I am only playing Devil's Advocate here.)