Why Do Some Elements Have Multiple Oxyanions While Others Do Not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter so-crates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electronegativity
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of various oxyanions, specifically ClO-, ClO2-, ClO3-, and ClO4-, compared to the absence of FO3- and the limited presence of IO3- and BrO3-. The primary reason for these differences is attributed to the electronegativity and size of the elements involved. Fluorine, being the most electronegative element, cannot be oxidized by oxygen, which explains the lack of FO3-. The behavior of pnictides, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, is also highlighted; phosphorus can form more complex oxyanions like H3PO4 due to having more electrons available for oxidation compared to nitrogen. The discussion touches on the ability of elements to form stable compounds based on their electron configurations, emphasizing that while the number of outer shell electrons is important, other factors like electronegativity and atomic size also play crucial roles in determining the formation of these compounds.
so-crates
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
Is there any theory as to why you have ClO-, ClO2-, ClO3-, and ClO4-, but only IO3- and BrO3- ? And why is there no FO3- ? I suspect this has something to do with electronegativety but I'm uncertain. And how come you have NO3-, but PO4 3-?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Periodate and perbromate exist (IO4- and BrO4-). There is also H5IO6, HBrO, and IO-.

You are correct. Fluorine is too small and too electronegative to be oxidized by oxygen. Fluorine is the only element more electronegative than oxygen.

All the pnictides (nitrogen group) have different behaviors when it comes to oxidation states. But basically, the reason you have H3PO4 for P in the +5 O.S. and not HPO3 is because phosphorous has more electrons to take away than nitrogen. Nitrogen only has 7 electrons total, and only 5 valence electrons. Once there are three oxygens taking electrons away from nitrogen it's over, no more oxygens can fit. Phosphorous has 15 electrons total and there are more than the 5 considered to be valence electrons that are available to be taken by oxygen. Another thing that contributes to this electron grabbing is the greater difference in electronegativity between phosphorous and oxygen.
 
heh

so-crates

Bill and Ted
 
Well, it's not completely determined by number of electrons in the outer shell, because you can relatively easily make noble gas compounds like XeF6, but for all practicle purposes its just looking at what can make a full shell, or half full shell.
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
23K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K