gracy
- 2,486
- 83
substances in their elemental state have enthalpies of formation equal to zero,why?
The discussion revolves around the concept of why substances in their elemental state have an enthalpy of formation equal to zero. Participants explore the implications of this definition, its conventions, and the nature of elements in their standard states.
Participants express differing views on whether the zero enthalpy of formation is a convention or a reflection of the nature of elements. There is no consensus on the underlying reasons for this definition, and the discussion remains unresolved.
Some participants reference the standard state of elements and the implications of different forms on enthalpy, indicating that the discussion may depend on specific definitions and contexts.
so no reason or concept behind this?Bystander said:Convention. There has to be an agreed upon zero, and this is as good as any.
cseil said:It is not some sort of convention.
It is just that elements are not formed, they exist like they are. That's it.
You don't form an element, element just exists.
You take one mole of O2 and turn it into one mole of O2.cseil said:How do you form O2 from its constituent elements if the costituent element at the most stable form is O2?
Bystander said:You take one mole of O2 and turn it into one mole of O2.
cseil said:I am sorry but isn't standard enthalpy of formation defined as the change of enthalpy that comes from the formation of 1 mol of the compound from its elements at the most stable state at 1 atm?
Certainly --- and ΔH for such a process is zero. However, what would I accomplish by breaking the bond in the first place? The mole of O2 doesn't need its bonds broken before I use it in whatever process I have in mind --- it's the zero point from which all measurements are made.cseil said:But don't you obtain the same energy again when the two bonds are formed again?