Why do symmetry and Hamiltonian operators commute?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wiemster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Symmetry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between symmetry operators and the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics, exploring why certain symmetry operators commute with the Hamiltonian. The scope includes theoretical considerations and implications of Noether's Theorem, as well as specific examples such as angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that Noether's Theorem provides a framework for understanding the connection between continuous symmetries and conserved quantities, suggesting that every symmetry corresponds to a conserved quantity of motion.
  • A specific example discussed is angular momentum, where the Hamiltonian is shown to be invariant under rotation, leading to the conclusion that angular momentum is a conserved quantity.
  • It is noted that the time evolution of the angular momentum operator must be zero for it to commute with the Hamiltonian, as derived from the Heisenberg equations of motion.
  • One participant expresses a feeling of inadequacy regarding their initial response, suggesting that symmetries of the Hamiltonian relate to eigenstates and multiplication by a constant.
  • Another participant summarizes that symmetries lead to conserved operators in quantum mechanics, implying commutation with the Hamiltonian through the Heisenberg equation of motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the connection between symmetries and conserved quantities, particularly through Noether's Theorem. However, there are varying interpretations and explanations regarding the implications of these symmetries and their mathematical representations, indicating that the discussion remains somewhat unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on complex theoretical concepts such as Noether's Theorem and the Heisenberg equations of motion, which may involve assumptions and definitions that are not fully explored or agreed upon by all participants.

Wiemster
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Why do operators representing some symmetry commute with the Hamiltonian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very deep question, and worthy of discussion. There are a few ways that you can look at this, but I'm going to look at it from the standpoint of Noether's Theorem, which states, more or less, that every continuous symmetry corresponds to a conserved quantity of the motion. This also applies to classical systems, or field theories, since the proof (as I've seen it) only relies on the presence of a lagrangian for the system and a generator of some transformation that leaves the action invariant.

As a specific example, let's look at the case of angular momentum, because it's the simplest non-trivial one. In the case of the coulomb potential, for example, the hamiltonian is given by

[tex] H = \frak{\mathbf{p}^2}{2m} + \frac{q_1 q_2}{r}[/tex]

The hamiltonian above is invariant under rotation (let's pretend we're in rectangular coordinates for now), and to see this, notice simply that [tex]\mathbf{p}^2[/tex] and [tex]1/r[/tex] are both functions of the magnitude of the vector, which is invariant under rotation, as we know from linear algebra. Thus, any generator of rotation must correspond to a conserved quantity. In both the classical and quantum case, this is the angular momentum, as we interpret the angular momentum as the generator of rotations.

So in this case we find that the angular momentum is a conserved quantity. However, because of the structure of angular momentum, we have to choose [tex]L^2[/tex] and one of the angular momentum components, usually [tex]L_z[/tex], to be conserved.

Why do these commute with the hamiltonian? Well, we know that, for example, [tex]L_z[/tex] must be a conserved quantity, so the time evolution of its state kets must be zero. From the Heisenberg equations of motion, we have that

[tex] \dot{L_z} = \frac{i}{\hbar} [ L_z, H ][/tex]

Knowing that the time evolution of the operator is zero, we have that the z component of the angular momentum commutes with the hamiltonian. A similar exercise arises for [tex]L^2[/tex]. This is also why the angular momentum eigenstates and energy eigenstates are product states of the two.

The fundamental physics to keep in mind, however, is Noether's Theorem, and that if you find some symmetry transformation of the hamiltonian/lagrangian that leaves the equations of motion invariant, then you've managed to find a conserved quantity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DHIMAN
My answer seems lame now! I was going to say that symmetries of the hamiltonian are eigenstates and so they are just multiplication by a constant...
 
Okay, so basically quantummechanically symmetries give rise to conserved operators (as classically they also give rise to conserved quantities) and via the Heisenberg equation of motion this implies the operator commutes with the Hamiltonian.

Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K