MHB Why do the subsets in a partition have to be nonempty?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ragnarok7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partition Subsets
Ragnarok7
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
"A partition of a set X is a set of nonempty subsets of X such that every element x in X is in exactly one of these subsets."

I was just wondering why the subsets must be nonempty. Is it just convention/convenient or is it because it would violate something else?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The empty set does not belong to any set of equivalence classes.
 
Ragnarok said:
"A partition of a set X is a set of nonempty subsets of X such that every element x in X is in exactly one of these subsets."

I was just wondering why the subsets must be nonempty. Is it just convention/convenient or is it because it would violate something else?

Thanks!
I think it's just a matter of definition.

Certainly, if you don't follow this, many results about partitions will need to be tweaked.
There is nothing mathematically wrong in including the empty set also when considering partitions but that is not how it has been done.
 
Partitions are used to generate equivalence relations on a set, and vice versa.

It is sometimes useful to consider partitions of the empty set itself; intuitively one feels that this partition should be unique, which is only possible if there are NO possible empty sets in a partition (convince yourself that this indeed comprises the only partition possible in the definition you gave for an empty set X).
 
Typically partitions are used to define a Riemann or Lebesgue integral.
For that to work, we need to be able to define a limit where the partition becomes infinitely fine grained, meaning each subset in the partition should be of size greater than or equal to $\varepsilon >0$.
In other words: not empty.
 
I like Serena said:
Typically partitions are used to define a Riemann or Lebesgue integral.
For that to work, we need to be able to define a limit where the partition becomes infinitely fine grained, meaning each subset in the partition should be of size greater than or equal to $\varepsilon >0$.
In other words: not empty.

Wrong kind of partition: the kind the OP is talking about might be a partition into singleton subsets, which would be fine...but such a partition would be rather unsuitable for integration.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top