Why do we conjugate operators in QFT?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gentsagree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the necessity of conjugating operators in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) by multiplying an operator A on both sides with its inverse A^(-1) and a transformation operator T. This process is exemplified through the relationship between Schrödinger and Heisenberg operators. The transformation operator T modifies the states |ψ⟩ and |φ⟩, allowing the computation of matrix elements ⟨φ|A|ψ⟩ and ⟨φ|T†AT|ψ⟩, demonstrating that conjugation of operators corresponds to transformations on states. This conjugation is essential for maintaining the consistency of quantum mechanics across different representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Field Theory (QFT) fundamentals
  • Understanding of operator algebra
  • Matrix mechanics in quantum physics
  • Transformation operators in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of operator conjugation in Quantum Mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures in QFT
  • Learn about transformation operators and their applications in quantum systems
  • Investigate the role of adjoint operators in quantum theory
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of Quantum Field Theory, and researchers interested in operator algebra and transformations in quantum mechanics.

gentsagree
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
Why do we multiply some operator A both on the left and on the right with, say, A and A^(-1) in order to perform some kind of conjugation?

If it helps, the example I'm thinking of is the relationship between Schrödinger and Heisenberg operators in QFT.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. I'm sorry but I don't understand what you are saying. Could you elaborate on the example?
 
Suppose we have some states ##| \psi \rangle##, ##| \phi \rangle## and an operator ##A##. We can compute the matrix element ##\langle \phi | A | \psi \rangle##. Then we can apply some transformation operator ##T## to the states to get new states ##T | \psi \rangle##, ##T | \phi \rangle##, and we can compute the matrix element of A between the new states, namely ##\langle \phi | T^\dagger A T | \psi \rangle##. We can see that this is equivalent to computing the matrix element of the transformed operator ##T^\dagger A T## between the original states ##| \psi \rangle## and ##| \phi \rangle##. So performing this sort of conjugation on operators is equivalent to performing a certain transformation on states. That's why this sort of conjugation appears so much.
 
The_Duck, thanks, great answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
783
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
928
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K