Why do we conjugate operators in QFT?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gentsagree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of conjugating operators in quantum field theory (QFT), particularly in relation to the transformation of states and the relationship between Schrödinger and Heisenberg operators. The scope includes theoretical exploration and conceptual clarification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of multiplying an operator both on the left and right for conjugation, seeking clarification through an example related to QFT.
  • Another participant requests further elaboration on the initial question, indicating a lack of understanding.
  • A third participant explains that conjugating an operator with a transformation operator is equivalent to transforming the states, providing a specific example involving matrix elements and transformations.
  • A later reply expresses appreciation for the explanation provided, indicating it was helpful.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion includes a request for clarification and an explanation of concepts, but there is no consensus reached on the initial question regarding the necessity of conjugation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the underlying assumptions about the nature of operators and transformations in QFT, nor does it clarify the specific conditions under which conjugation is applied.

gentsagree
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
Why do we multiply some operator A both on the left and on the right with, say, A and A^(-1) in order to perform some kind of conjugation?

If it helps, the example I'm thinking of is the relationship between Schrödinger and Heisenberg operators in QFT.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. I'm sorry but I don't understand what you are saying. Could you elaborate on the example?
 
Suppose we have some states ##| \psi \rangle##, ##| \phi \rangle## and an operator ##A##. We can compute the matrix element ##\langle \phi | A | \psi \rangle##. Then we can apply some transformation operator ##T## to the states to get new states ##T | \psi \rangle##, ##T | \phi \rangle##, and we can compute the matrix element of A between the new states, namely ##\langle \phi | T^\dagger A T | \psi \rangle##. We can see that this is equivalent to computing the matrix element of the transformed operator ##T^\dagger A T## between the original states ##| \psi \rangle## and ##| \phi \rangle##. So performing this sort of conjugation on operators is equivalent to performing a certain transformation on states. That's why this sort of conjugation appears so much.
 
The_Duck, thanks, great answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
971
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K