I Why Do We Have The Effect Of Spontaneous Emission And Absorption

Messages
10,922
Reaction score
3,799
Hi All

In another thread I answered was a question related to this and noticed another as well, so I thought I would give the full answer in its own thread rather than write it out twice. The other question has been deleted but here is the full detail anyway.

First see:
http://www.physics.usu.edu/torre/3700_Spring_2015/What_is_a_photon.pdf

We can view the interaction with the Quantum EM Field on an otherwise stationary state as a small perturbation and hence apply an important theorem - Fermi's Golden Rule:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi's_golden_rule

I gave a link to Wikipedia, but that's just because it came up first on a search to get a link. There are tons of other papers on it, and while fully working through it may take a bit of time if you have not seen it before, it is an important result, and worth the effort in understanding it.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DrChinese, Simon Bridge, jerromyjon and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
... so, in other words, "how would a stationary state change?" ... with the answer being, it does not: the physical state in real life is not absolutely the stationary one because the calculation left out some stuff.
Only going into detail.

Have I got it?

It's neat. Could it be an insights article?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Have I got it?

You got it.

That paper is an insights article itself without me or someone else writing one.

Watch out if you are carefully going through the math - I can't remember where but there is an 'error' I had to use some other books like Dirac's classic text to clarify. But if you come across it just do a post here.

Excellent introduction to QFT as well - read before studying QFT for the Gifted Amateur and Student Friendly QFT. Both books are more than good enough to have as an introduction all those seriously interested in physics should have about QFT. Beyond that I would study Banks:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521850827/?tag=pfamazon01-20

As one review says - perfect to read before going onto the master - Wienberg.

Do not study Zee - I originally thought it good - but now think its far too 'pokey' and do not like it.

Thanks
Bill
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top