Why do we take the no. of years to compound the interest as power?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Juwane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interest Power Years
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the mathematical foundation behind compound interest, specifically why the number of compounding periods is represented as an exponent in the formula. When interest is compounded multiple times per year, the correct formula is A(1 + r/n)^(nt), where A is the principal amount, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of compounding periods per year, and t is the number of years. This exponentiation reflects the repeated application of interest on previously earned interest, demonstrating the principle of compounding. The example provided illustrates how interest accumulates over multiple periods, emphasizing the importance of understanding compounding as a series of multiplicative processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic expressions
  • Familiarity with the concept of interest rates
  • Knowledge of the principles of compounding
  • Ability to manipulate exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formula for compound interest: A(t) = A_0(1 + r/n)^(nt)
  • Learn about different compounding frequencies and their effects on total interest
  • Explore financial calculators that compute compound interest
  • Investigate the implications of continuous compounding in finance
USEFUL FOR

Finance students, accountants, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of compound interest and its applications in financial calculations.

Juwane
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Why do we take the "no. of years to compound the interest" as power?

Suppose interest is given at 12% annually, compounded once a year. At the end of the year we will have (A = starting amount):

[tex]A( 1 + 0.12 )[/tex]

But if it is compounded twice a year, then at the end of the year we will have:

[tex]2A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)[/tex]

Why is the above wrong? Why it should be [tex]A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)^2[/tex] instead of [tex]2A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)?[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Juwane said:
Suppose interest is given at 12% annually, compounded once a year. At the end of the year we will have (A = starting amount):

[tex]A( 1 + 0.12 )[/tex]

But if it is compounded twice a year, then at the end of the year we will have:

[tex]2A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)[/tex]

Why is the above wrong? We it should be [tex]A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)^2[/tex] instead of [tex]2A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)?[/tex]

The interest you earned for the first half year is now money upon which you earn more interest for the second half of the year. Take for example 20% interest on 100 dollars compounded twice a year. In the first half-year you earn 10% of $100 so you have $100+$10= $110.
For the second half-year you earn 10% on the $110 so you have $110 + $11 = $121.

That's what "compounded" means. You earn interest on the interest, and then interest on the interest on the interest, and so on.

It helps to forget "years" and work only with "periods". Say you earn interest per period at a rate of [tex]r_p[/tex]. For a given period if you start with an amount [tex]A[/tex] at the end of that period you have amount [tex]A + r_p A= A(1+r_p)[/tex].

Do this for [tex]k[/tex] periods and you have:
[tex]A=A_0(1+r_p)(1+r_p)\cdots(1+r_p) = A_0(1+r_p)^k[/tex]

Understand that formula first. Each compounding period effects a multiplication by 1 plus the rate. Repeated multiplications are expressed by a power.

Now we rescale to years. Given an annual rate of r and n periods in a year and t years.
[tex]r_p = r/n[/tex]
[tex]k = nt[/tex]
so
[tex]A(t) =A_0\left(1+r_p\right)^k= A_0 \left(1 + \frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}[/tex]

(with [tex]A_0 = P[/tex] the initial amount is called the "principle" by accountants.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K