Why does (-1)^n(sin(pi/n)) converge when (sin(p/n)) diverges

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of the series ∑(-1)^n*sin(π/n) despite the divergence of ∑sin(p/n). The key insight is that for large n, sin(π/n) approximates π/n, leading to the alternating series behaving like πΣ(1/n) - πΣ(1/(n+1)), which converges to πln(2). The divergence of both ∑(-1)^n and ∑sin(π/n) does not imply the divergence of their alternating series, as demonstrated by the example of a_n = b_n = 1/n, where their product converges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence tests, particularly the comparison test.
  • Familiarity with alternating series and their convergence criteria.
  • Basic knowledge of limits and approximations in calculus.
  • Experience with trigonometric functions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Alternating Series Test and its applications in convergence analysis.
  • Explore the concept of series rearrangement and its effects on convergence.
  • Learn about the properties of sin(x) for small x and its implications in series.
  • Investigate the relationship between divergent series and their products in convergence contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or real analysis, and anyone interested in series convergence and trigonometric function behavior.

solour
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I know that ∑n=1 to infinity (sin(p/n)) diverges due using comparison test with pi/n, despite it approaching 0 as n approaches infinity.

However, an alternating series with (-1)^n*sin(pi/n) converges. Which does not make sense because it consists of two diverging functions.

Is there any intuitive explanation for this? Or is it just a rule that I need to remember when treating alternating series

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about this: For large n, sin(π/n) is approximately π/n, so the series is approximately πΣ(1/π) which is known to diverge.

With alternating signs, the series approximates πΣ( (1/n) - 1/(n+1) ) which approaches π.ln(2). Actually I think I find it more persuasive to group pairs of successive terms:
(1/n) - 1/(n+1) = 1/(n(n+1)) = O(1/n2), but I gather that's not always a safe thing to do.
 
solour said:
However, an alternating series with (-1)^n*sin(pi/n) converges. Which does not make sense because it consists of two diverging functions.
The fact that ##\sum (-1)^n## and##\sum \sin(\pi/n)## both diverge says absolutely nothing about the alternating series. If you don't believe that, you might consider ##a_n = b_n = 1/n##. Neither ##\sum a_n## nor ##\sum b_n## converge, but ##\sum a_nb_n = \sum 1/n^2## converges.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jamison Lahman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
20K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K