MHB Why Does \( a_1 \mid b_1 b_2 \cdots b_n \) in Theorem 7.2.20?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the proof of Theorem 7.2.20 from "The Basics of Abstract Algebra" by Paul E. Bland, specifically the statement that if \( a = a_1 a_2 \cdots a_m = b_1 b_2 \cdots b_n \) with irreducible factors, then \( a_1 \mid b_1 b_2 \cdots b_n \). Participants clarify that if \( a_1 \) divides the product \( b_1 b_2 \cdots b_n \), it implies there exists a \( y \) such that \( a_1 y = b_1 b_2 \cdots b_n \). The conversation concludes with the understanding that \( y \) can be expressed as the product of the remaining factors \( a_2 a_3 \cdots a_m \). This reinforces the concept of divisibility in the context of irreducible elements in algebraic structures. The explanation effectively clarifies the relationship between the factors and their divisibility.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading The Basics of Abstract Algebra by Paul E. Bland ...

I am focused on Section 7.2 Euclidean, Principal Ideal, Unique Factorization Domains ... ...

I need help with the proof of Theorem 7.2.20 ... ... Theorem 7.2.20 and its proof reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8280
View attachment 8281
In the last paragraph of the above proof by Bland we read the following:

" ... ... If $$a = a_1 a_2 \ ... \ ... \ a_m = b_1 b_2 \ ... \ ... \ b_n$$ where each $$a_i$$ and $$b_i$$ is irreducible, then $$a_1 \mid b_1 b_2 \ ... \ ... \ b_n$$ ... ... "
Can someone please explain exactly and in detail why/how $$a_1 \mid b_1 b_2 \ ... \ ... \ b_n$$ ... ... Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notate $x=b_1 b_2 \cdots b_n$
What does it mean if $a_1$ divides $x$ ?
It means that there is a $y \in D$ such that $a_1y=x$
Can you tell now what is $y$ ?
 
steenis said:
Notate $x=b_1 b_2 \cdots b_n$
What does it mean if $a_1$ divides $x$ ?
It means that there is a $y \in D$ such that $a_1y=x$
Can you tell now what is $y$ ?
Thanks for the help Steenis ...

Basically you have pointed out that:

$$a_1 ( a_2 a_3 \ ... \ ... \ a_m ) = b_1 b_2 \ ... \ ... \ b_n $$

$$\Longrightarrow a_1 \mid b_1 b_2 \ ... \ ... \ b_n$$The above implies that in what you have written we have $$y = a_2 a_3 \ ... \ ... \ a_m$$ ... ...Is that correct?

Peter
 
Correct, and do you understand that therefore $a_1|b_1 \cdots b_n$ ?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K