Why Does Bell's Calculation Yield a Negative Cosine?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam Lewis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bell Derivation Sign
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on reproducing Bell's calculation for the expectation value of paired spin measurements in a singlet state using the Pauli matrices. The calculation shows that the expectation value P(a,b) simplifies to (\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b})=\cos(\theta), while the commonly cited result is -\cos(\theta). The discrepancy arises from the need to account for the anti-parallel nature of spins in the singlet state, which may not be inherently represented in the operator formulation. Clarification on the role of the Pauli matrices in this context is essential for resolving the confusion regarding the negative sign.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin states
  • Familiarity with Bell's theorem and its implications
  • Knowledge of Pauli matrices and their commutation relations
  • Basic grasp of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Bell's theorem and its implications for quantum entanglement
  • Study the properties and applications of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of singlet states and their significance in quantum physics
  • Investigate the role of expectation values in quantum measurements
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers exploring the foundations of quantum theory and entanglement will benefit from this discussion.

Adam Lewis
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to reproduce Bell's calculation for the expectation value of paired spin measurements on particles in the singlet state. For unit vectors [itex]\hat{a}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{b}[/itex] we want to calculate

[tex]P(a,b)=<\psi|(\hat{a}\cdot\vec{\sigma})(\hat{b} \cdot \vec{\sigma})|\psi>[/tex]

where [itex]|\psi>[/itex] is the singlet state.

Via the commutation and anticommutation relations for the Pauli matrices the enclosed operator is simply

[tex](\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b})I + \imath\vec{\sigma}\cdot(\hat{a}\times\hat{b}).[/tex]

As a scalar the dot product can be pulled from the bra-ket, leaving [itex](\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b})<\psi|I|\psi>=(\hat{a}\cdot \hat{b})[/itex] since the singlet state is normalized. The cross product's expectation value turns out to vanish. Thus the final answer is

[tex]P(a,b)=(\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b})=\cos(\theta).[/tex]

The answer usually quoted, however, is [itex]-\cos(\theta)[/itex], and I can't figure out where the minus sign is coming from. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, that would get you the minus sign. But I had thought the fact the spins were anti-parallel to be already encoded by the singlet state. It seems odd to me that you should have to insert this information again via the operator. Maybe I'm misunderstanding how [itex]\vec{\sigma}[/itex] is supposed to work?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
11K