Why does BIDMAS not always apply to squaring negative numbers?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AlfieD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Numbers
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of expressions involving negative numbers and the application of BIDMAS (brackets, indices, division, multiplication, addition, subtraction) in mathematical operations, particularly focusing on squaring negative numbers and square roots of negative numbers. Participants explore the implications of these interpretations in various mathematical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that -52 should be interpreted as -(52), leading to -25, while others suggest it could be seen as (-5)², which equals 25.
  • There is a discussion about the square root of negative numbers, with some stating that √(-25) equals ±5i, while others express confusion about the implications of this notation.
  • Several participants clarify that the square of a negative number is positive, specifically noting that (-5)² = 25, contrasting with -5² = -25.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about how BIDMAS applies to square roots and whether they fall under the category of indices.
  • There are claims that misunderstandings about notation may lead to confusion regarding the results of these operations.
  • One participant mentions that their teacher insists that -52 equals 25, which others challenge based on their interpretations of the notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of -52 and its relation to BIDMAS. There are multiple competing views regarding the correct interpretation of negative numbers in mathematical expressions, leading to ongoing debate and confusion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that there may be misunderstandings regarding notation and the definitions of expressions, which contribute to the disagreement. The discussion highlights the importance of clarity in mathematical communication.

  • #31
AlfieD said:
The thread is http://https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=4626547#post4626547.

If you look at the Youtube video attached, and look at the 'about' info section, it links to a second proof. If you click on that and skip to around the 3:52 mark and listen for 20 seconds, he says that -12=1, now he used no parentheses so strictly speaking, using BIDMAS, we should do the indices first, so 12 which is obviously 1, and then we should add the negative sign. So if \chi=-1, then \chi2 should equal -1, and 3\chi2 should be -3 right? He said that 3\chi2 was +3. Is he wrong?

Sorry to keep this going but I saw it and got confused because he's supposed to be some super duper clever dude, but I thought that he was wrong. It's probably me that's wrong haha, but could someone please just check this. Thanks.

I just watch the video, and he did not say that ##-1^{2} = 1##.

If ##x=-1## then he is correct, ##x^{2} = 1##, why do you think it should be ##-1##? That is x squared, x is negative one, negative one squared is positive one. We've already explained that a negative number squared is positive. x is a negative number. Square it. It is positive.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
1MileCrash said:
I just watch the video, and he did not say that ##-1^{2} = 1##.

If ##x=-1## then he is correct, ##x^{2} = 1##, why do you think it should be ##-1##? That is x squared, x is negative one, negative one squared is positive one. We've already explained that a negative number squared is positive. x is a negative number. Square it. It is positive.

But if you substitute ##x## for it's value of -1, so ##x##2 would become -12, which would be -1. Or does it not go to that when you change it?
 
  • #33
AlfieD said:
But if you substitute ##x## for it's value of -1, so ##x##2 would become -12, which would be -1. Or does it not go to that when you change it?

No, if you substitute x for its value of -1, it becomes ##(-1)^{2}##. You have to preserve the meaning, ##-1^{2}## is in no way, shape, or form, squaring x.

x is -1. Squaring x is squaring -1. Squaring -1 is (-1)^2.

If I wanted to replace the 5 in ##5^{2}## with 2 + 3, would I write ##2 + 3^{2}##? No, that is nonsense, they are two different things.
 
  • #34
1MileCrash said:
If I wanted to replace the 5 in ##5^{2}## with 2 + 3, would I write ##2 + 3^{2}##? No, that is nonsense.

Yeah, haha that's complete nonsense. Thanks, that was clear. :) I'm pretty sure I'm OK with all of this negative squaring business now. :D
 
  • #35
AlfieD said:
Yeah, haha that's complete nonsense. Thanks, that was clear. :) I'm pretty sure I'm OK with all of this negative squaring business now. :D

Furthermore, in general, if you have an equation with some "x", when you put a value in it, you should always put parenthesis around it, because otherwise you can lose any meaning of x if x itself contains operations.

For example, if I have ##2x + x^{2}## and I want to replace x with "y + z," the way to do that is to write ##2(y + z) + (y + z)^{2}##. If I don't put those parenthesis for the first term, I am not doubling x, or y + z, I am doubling y and then adding z afterwards, and a similar problem arises for the second term.
 
  • #36
1MileCrash said:
Furthermore, in general, if you have an equation with some "x", when you put a value in it, you should always put parenthesis around it, because otherwise you can lose any meaning of x if x itself contains operations.

For example, if I have ##2x + x^{2}## and I want to replace x with "y + z," the way to do that is to write ##2(y + z) + (y + z)^{2}##. If I don't put those parenthesis for the first term, I am not doubling x, or y + z, I am doubling y and then adding z afterwards, and a similar problem arises for the second term.

Yeah, awesome, I understand that.
 
  • #37
AlfieD said:
But if you substitute ##x## for it's value of -1, so ##x##2 would become -12, which would be -1. Or does it not go to that when you change it?

I told you to use parentheses. Then x2 for x=-1 becomes (-1)2 and there is no ambiguity.

Besides, linking here to another thread you started two separate discussions on the same subject. It always means mess. I am locking this thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K