Why does BIDMAS not always apply to squaring negative numbers?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AlfieD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Numbers
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
36 replies · 8K views
AlfieD said:
The thread is http://https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=4626547#post4626547.

If you look at the Youtube video attached, and look at the 'about' info section, it links to a second proof. If you click on that and skip to around the 3:52 mark and listen for 20 seconds, he says that -12=1, now he used no parentheses so strictly speaking, using BIDMAS, we should do the indices first, so 12 which is obviously 1, and then we should add the negative sign. So if [itex]\chi[/itex]=-1, then [itex]\chi[/itex]2 should equal -1, and 3[itex]\chi[/itex]2 should be -3 right? He said that 3[itex]\chi[/itex]2 was +3. Is he wrong?

Sorry to keep this going but I saw it and got confused because he's supposed to be some super duper clever dude, but I thought that he was wrong. It's probably me that's wrong haha, but could someone please just check this. Thanks.

I just watch the video, and he did not say that ##-1^{2} = 1##.

If ##x=-1## then he is correct, ##x^{2} = 1##, why do you think it should be ##-1##? That is x squared, x is negative one, negative one squared is positive one. We've already explained that a negative number squared is positive. x is a negative number. Square it. It is positive.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1MileCrash said:
I just watch the video, and he did not say that ##-1^{2} = 1##.

If ##x=-1## then he is correct, ##x^{2} = 1##, why do you think it should be ##-1##? That is x squared, x is negative one, negative one squared is positive one. We've already explained that a negative number squared is positive. x is a negative number. Square it. It is positive.

But if you substitute ##x## for it's value of -1, so ##x##2 would become -12, which would be -1. Or does it not go to that when you change it?
 
AlfieD said:
But if you substitute ##x## for it's value of -1, so ##x##2 would become -12, which would be -1. Or does it not go to that when you change it?

No, if you substitute x for its value of -1, it becomes ##(-1)^{2}##. You have to preserve the meaning, ##-1^{2}## is in no way, shape, or form, squaring x.

x is -1. Squaring x is squaring -1. Squaring -1 is (-1)^2.

If I wanted to replace the 5 in ##5^{2}## with 2 + 3, would I write ##2 + 3^{2}##? No, that is nonsense, they are two different things.
 
1MileCrash said:
If I wanted to replace the 5 in ##5^{2}## with 2 + 3, would I write ##2 + 3^{2}##? No, that is nonsense.

Yeah, haha that's complete nonsense. Thanks, that was clear. :) I'm pretty sure I'm OK with all of this negative squaring business now. :D
 
AlfieD said:
Yeah, haha that's complete nonsense. Thanks, that was clear. :) I'm pretty sure I'm OK with all of this negative squaring business now. :D

Furthermore, in general, if you have an equation with some "x", when you put a value in it, you should always put parenthesis around it, because otherwise you can lose any meaning of x if x itself contains operations.

For example, if I have ##2x + x^{2}## and I want to replace x with "y + z," the way to do that is to write ##2(y + z) + (y + z)^{2}##. If I don't put those parenthesis for the first term, I am not doubling x, or y + z, I am doubling y and then adding z afterwards, and a similar problem arises for the second term.
 
1MileCrash said:
Furthermore, in general, if you have an equation with some "x", when you put a value in it, you should always put parenthesis around it, because otherwise you can lose any meaning of x if x itself contains operations.

For example, if I have ##2x + x^{2}## and I want to replace x with "y + z," the way to do that is to write ##2(y + z) + (y + z)^{2}##. If I don't put those parenthesis for the first term, I am not doubling x, or y + z, I am doubling y and then adding z afterwards, and a similar problem arises for the second term.

Yeah, awesome, I understand that.
 
AlfieD said:
But if you substitute ##x## for it's value of -1, so ##x##2 would become -12, which would be -1. Or does it not go to that when you change it?

I told you to use parentheses. Then x2 for x=-1 becomes (-1)2 and there is no ambiguity.

Besides, linking here to another thread you started two separate discussions on the same subject. It always means mess. I am locking this thread.