Why does commuting matrices have same eigenvectors?

Click For Summary
Commuting matrices share the same eigenvectors due to the properties of hermitian matrices in quantum mechanics. If two nxn commuting hermitian matrices A and B are considered, any eigenvector v of A with eigenvalue a leads to Bv also being an eigenvector of A with the same eigenvalue. This stability of the eigenspace V_a under B implies that B can be represented in a block diagonal form relative to a basis of eigenvectors of A. Each block corresponds to a distinct eigenvalue of A and contains its own set of linearly independent eigenvectors. Thus, the relationship between commuting matrices ensures that their eigenvectors are interconnected.
netheril96
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
I googled for a proof,but didn't find one.
Could anyone give me a link to a proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework or test problem? If so, you're not likely to get much help without showing what you have tried.
 
Mark44 said:
Is this a homework or test problem? If so, you're not likely to get much help without showing what you have tried.

Neither
I just read a book on quantum physics which mentioned this theorem.I want a rigorous proof.
 
First off, this is QM so let's specialize to hermitian matrices and recall that those always have a complete set of eigenvectors. Suppose A and B are two nxn commuting hermitian matrices over C. And suppose v is an eigenvector of A with eigenvalue a: Av=av. Then, A(Bv)=(AB)v=(BA)v=B(Av)=B(av)=a(Bv). That is to say, if v is an eigenvector of A with eigenvalue, then Bv is also an eigenvector of A with eigenvalue a. Another way to say this is that the eigenspace V_a of A corresponding to the eigenvalue a is stable under B, meaning B(V_a)\subset V_a.

What this means is that if you write the matrix B with respect to a basis of C^n of the form (b_1,...,b_n) where each b_i is an eigenvector of A and where adjacent vectors correspond to the same eigenvalue, then B will be block diagonal. And each block is itself a hermitian matrix, so for instance if the first block is kxk, then it has k linearly independant eigenvectors. And if (w1,...,wk) is any such eigenvector, then (w1,...,wk,0,...0) is an eigenvector of B. And since it lives in the eigenspace of the first eigenvalue of A, then it is also an eigenvector of A. And so like that, for each mxm block of B we find m linearly independant eigenvectors of B which are also eigenvectors of A.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K