Why does cotangent inverse of 0 equal pi/2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical concept of the inverse cotangent function, specifically why cotangent inverse of 0 equals pi/2. Participants are exploring the definitions and properties of cotangent and tangent functions in trigonometry.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the relationship between cotangent and tangent, and how the inverse functions relate to their definitions. There is confusion regarding the values of cotangent at specific angles, particularly at pi/2.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various interpretations being explored. Some participants are providing insights into the definitions of cotangent and tangent, while others are questioning the assumptions made about their values at certain points. There is no explicit consensus, but productive dialogue is occurring.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the undefined nature of tangent at pi/2 and how that relates to the value of cotangent. Participants are also discussing the implications of division by zero in the context of these functions.

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I don't understand why cot^(-1)(0) = pi/2 and was hoping someone could explain this to me. cot(theta)=1/tan(theta)
because tan^(-1)(0) is undefined

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're confusing cot^{-1}(\theta) = {{1}\over{cot(\theta)}} with the Arc-cotangent or "Inverse cotangent", which is the inverse function of cotan(\theta). The inverse cotangent is the function that tells you what values of \theta give you the value 'x' in cotan(\theta) = x.

So in other words, cot^{-1}(0) is asking what values of \theta give you cot(\theta) = 0.

EDIT: Ok I think I got that squared away correctly.
 
Last edited:
oh so cot(0) is undefined because
cot(0) = 1/tan(0) = 1/0 = undefined, makes sense
cot(pi/2) = 1/tan(pi/2) = 1/undefined =/= 0
I don't see how the two are equal, and you I think I may be getting some things mixed up as I haven't dealt with basic trig in several years lolz
 
No, cot(pi/2) = 0.

Why would they be equal in the first place?
 
Pengwuino said:
No, cot(pi/2) = 0.

Why would they be equal in the first place?

cot(theta)=1/tan(theta)
cot(pi/2) should then be equal to 1/tan(pi/2)
cot(pi/2) = 0 = 1/tan(pi/2)

I just don't understand why
1/tan(pi/2) is equal to zero
because tan(pi/2) = undefined
so 1/tan(pi/2) = 1/undefined
how is this equal to zero?[/quote]
Rather than think of cot(x) as 1/tan(x), a more fundamental definition is: tan(x)= sin(x)/cos(x) and cot(x)= cos(x)/sin(x). sin(\pi/2)= 1 and cos(\pi/2)= 0 so tan(\pi/2) is undefined (the denominator is 0) while cot(\pi/2)= 0 (the numerator is 0).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
cot-1(x) is another way to write the arccot(x) function.

cot-1(x) ≠ 1/cot(x) .
 
GreenPrint said:
cot(theta)=1/tan(theta)
cot(pi/2) should then be equal to 1/tan(pi/2)
cot(pi/2) = 0 = 1/tan(pi/2)

I just don't understand why
1/tan(pi/2) is equal to zero
because tan(pi/2) = undefined
so 1/tan(pi/2) = 1/undefined
how is this equal to zero?

It's undefined in the sense that division by zero is not allowed. Think about it this way, if \frac{a}{\left(\frac{b}{c}\right)}=\frac{ac}{b} then \frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{0}\right)}=0

Or you can even think of division by zero as being \pm\infty so when we divide a finite value by this amount, we get 0.
 
Hi Greenprint. Mentallic has the correct answer here. 1/0 is undefined however 0/1 is perfectly well defined and is equal to zero.
 
\cot^{-1}(0) = \pi/2 \Rightarrow \cot(\pi/2) = 0

Trying to rearrange it so you can use the more familiar tan doesn't really help since it brings in division by 0. Take a look at the graph of cot-1x and see what the value is when x = 0
 

Attachments

  • wolframalpha-20110806132908793.gif
    wolframalpha-20110806132908793.gif
    6 KB · Views: 1,394
  • #10
I think it would help to point out that the basic definition of cot(x) is cos(x)/sin(x), not 1/tan(x). At x= \pi/2, tan(x) is not defined but cos(\pi/2)= cos(\pi/2)/sin(\pi/2)= 0/1= 0
 
  • #11
O.P. acknowledged that \cot(\pi/2)= 0 in Post #5.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K