- #1
- 135
- 1
Today, while I was exploring my system properties, I found that my computer shows only 0.99 Mb RAM. But I have 1 GB of RAM and I have Windows XP SP2. Why does computer show 0.99 Mb ?
In summary, your computer is showing only 0.99 Mb of memory, but you have 1 GB of RAM. Windows XP SP2 is reporting this lower memory size because it's using what's called "system properties" to report your computer's hardware and software. This includes reporting your computer's total memory size, which includes both physical memory and virtual memory. However, there may be a problem with one or more sectors on your hard drive, which is causing Windows XP SP2 to not be able to use the full 1 GB of your RAM.
- #2
- 19,251
- 9,619
physics kiddy said:
You are sure it is Mb and not Gb?
- #3
- 135
- 1
I am really sorry. It's GB. Why does it show only 0.99 and not 1 GB ?
- #4
DaveC426913
Gold Member
- 22,183
- 5,734
physics kiddy said:
1Gb is not 1000Mb; it's 1024Mb. It may be reporting one or the other.
A sector may have gone bad, and your system have have dropped it from use.
A dozen other reasons, none of which mean you need to worry about it.
- #5
rcgldr
Homework Helper
- 8,844
- 621
Try clicking on start / run / then enter msinfo32 to run msinfo32.exe and see what it reports for your memory size. I'm not sure what system properties is reporting when it reports ram size, but it could be subtracting part of the operating system's overhead (like mapping tables for virtual memory) from available ram.
- #6
- 135
- 1
My bro says that sometimes it happens that OS is not able to make use of the total available memory and so it shows 0.99 GB.
Meanwhile, what is the difference between Virtual and Physical Memory ?
Meanwhile, what is the difference between Virtual and Physical Memory ?
- #7
DaveC426913
Gold Member
- 22,183
- 5,734
physics kiddy said:
RAM is active memory use by the computer while running programs. Virtual memory is what it creates when it doesn't have enough RAM; it uses disk space as if it were RAM. Essentially it creates a big swap file containing pages that it swap in and out of RAM quickly. Usage of disk space this way is faster than usage as storage, but it's only temporary - while programs are running.
Virtual memory is slower than RAM but faster than disk memory.
I've been building a cedar plank carport recently.
My workroom = disk storage - everything is organized with a permanent location - but I have to go inside to get it
My worktable in the driveway = RAM - what I am working on right now - the chop saw
My picnic table = virtual memory - I ran out of room on my worktable (because the chopsaw is huge), so all my other tools need a place to sit when I'm using the chopsaw. And I don't want to have to go downstairs to the workroom every time I need a hammer and nail. The picnic table is quick but tempory access.
Last edited:
- #8
- #9
- 135
- 1
are wiki articles always reliable ? Someone told me wikis have 90% false information ... is that true ?
- #10
DaveC426913
Gold Member
- 22,183
- 5,734
No. What a silly thing for your friend to say. They are guilty of the very thing they accuse wiki of doing - spreading false information.physics kiddy said:
Wiki is a great point of first contact for lots of information. It can be very useful for the level a layperson might be interested in - like your question. It's also a good jumping off point for further reading. There are links at the bottom to sources.
What you don't want to do is use it exclusively, and rely on it to be accurate when reliability on accuracy is critical, such as when writing a paper.
It is a great encyclopedia on virtually everything; it is not an authority on anything.
Last edited:
- #11
- 135
- 1
Since everything is editable in Wikipedia, I guessed someone might write false info. That's why I never consulted Wikipedia for getting info.
- #12
DaveC426913
Gold Member
- 22,183
- 5,734
physics kiddy said:
Yes, it is always a risk. But Wiki is self-monitoring. Someone's false info will last for a very short time before ten other contributors descend upon it and remove it or correct it.
- #13
rcgldr
Homework Helper
- 8,844
- 621
The main thing missing from the wiki artlicle list I posted before is dealing with page fragmentation. Intel uses a page size of 4k (or 4MB but I'm not aware of any OS using this). For applications that run continously, continuous allocation and freeing of small amounts of memory, including stuff automatcally allocated and freed by windows for user interface stuff, can result in only portions of each 4K page being used. Eventually the application runs out of those pages, which Windows will report as out of memory, even though the application is only using about the same amount of memory. Windows .NET framework includes a garbage collector to avoid this issue, but then the application has to allocate and access memory based objects via .NET roots (pointers to pointers to objects) in order for the garbage collection feature to operate. The application also ends up getting paused during garbage collection cycles, so this scheme wouldn't work in real time environment unless a second real time task wasn't based on .NET and instead sent messages to the primary app which would queue messages when it was paused. Wiki article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework#Memory_management
For Microsoft Visual Studio, garbage collectable objects are allocated via handles with gcnew instead of new, and in C++, handles are declared using '^' instead of '*', for example: MyClass ^ p_MyClass = gcnew MyClass; . (The old syntax for '^' was '__gc *' (VC 2002 and 2003)).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework#Memory_management
For Microsoft Visual Studio, garbage collectable objects are allocated via handles with gcnew instead of new, and in C++, handles are declared using '^' instead of '*', for example: MyClass ^ p_MyClass = gcnew MyClass; . (The old syntax for '^' was '__gc *' (VC 2002 and 2003)).
Last edited:
- #14
- 352
- 2
physics kiddy said:
I find it odd that you wouldn't trust Wikipedia, but would trust a forum (ie Physics Forums). In both cases anyone can write anything. In both cases people tend mostly write accurate information, and point out and correct incorrect information.
- #15
- 11
- 0
May be its not showing 1GB because its reserved for video memory...
- #16
chroot
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 10,276
- 41
DirectCurrent is right, some portion of the 1 GB of main RAM is being used for video memory. This has nothing to do with paging or anything else.
- Warren
- Warren
- #17
rcgldr
Homework Helper
- 8,844
- 621
video ram - unless the motherboard has an onboard video card that shares the main ram for it's video then the ram isn't being used by the video card.
If you click on start, run, msinfo32 (to run msinfo32.exe), then click on memory, it will display a map of all the address space on your computer, including the main ram, and any memory address space used by the hardware on your computer.
If you click on start, run, msinfo32 (to run msinfo32.exe), then click on memory, it will display a map of all the address space on your computer, including the main ram, and any memory address space used by the hardware on your computer.
1. Why is my computer only showing 0.99 MB of RAM?
There are a few possible reasons for this. One possibility is that your computer has a faulty RAM module, which could be causing it to only recognize a fraction of its total RAM capacity. Another possibility is that your computer's BIOS settings may be limiting the amount of RAM that is detected. Additionally, if you have recently added or upgraded your RAM, it may not be fully compatible with your computer's hardware, causing it to only recognize a portion of the total capacity.
2. Can I fix this issue myself?
If the cause of the issue is a faulty RAM module, it is recommended to have it replaced by a professional. However, if the issue is related to BIOS settings, you may be able to adjust them yourself by accessing the BIOS menu during startup. If the issue is related to compatibility, it may require purchasing new RAM sticks that are compatible with your computer's hardware.
3. Is 0.99 MB of RAM enough for my computer to function properly?
No, 0.99 MB of RAM is not enough for a computer to function properly. Most modern operating systems and applications require much more RAM to run smoothly. This amount of RAM may be suitable for very basic tasks, but it is recommended to have at least 4 GB of RAM for optimal performance.
4. Could a virus or malware be causing my computer to only show 0.99 MB of RAM?
No, a virus or malware would not cause your computer to only show 0.99 MB of RAM. However, a virus or malware could potentially cause other issues that could affect your computer's performance and memory usage.
5. Is it possible to add more RAM to my computer?
Yes, it is possible to add more RAM to your computer. This can typically be done by purchasing compatible RAM sticks and installing them into your computer's RAM slots. However, it is important to make sure your computer's hardware and BIOS settings can support the additional RAM before making any upgrades.