Why does observing an electron prevent it from entering a superposition?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter melkorthefoul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superposition
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
melkorthefoul
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

Quick question. Just started QM in class, and we discussed the double slit experiment. I am just a bit confused here. From what I understand, if just one electron is shot at the slits, it enters a superposition of states based on probabilities, and interferes with itself, resulting in an interference pattern on the screen (Stop me if I go wrong anywhere). However, if the electron is observed, then it cannot enter a superposition of states, and no interference pattern is formed. Why is this so? If it is because observing the electron (hitting it with a photon) disturbs it, then shouldn't background EM radiation do the same thing?

As I said, confused. Help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
melkorthefoul said:
Hi guys,

Quick question. Just started QM in class, and we discussed the double slit experiment. I am just a bit confused here. From what I understand, if just one electron is shot at the slits, it enters a superposition of states based on probabilities, and interferes with itself, resulting in an interference pattern on the screen (Stop me if I go wrong anywhere). However, if the electron is observed, then it cannot enter a superposition of states, and no interference pattern is formed. Why is this so? If it is because observing the electron (hitting it with a photon) disturbs it, then shouldn't background EM radiation do the same thing?

As I said, confused. Help me out?



Nobody truly understands the double slit experiment and you are not going to get help on this issue here. If you want somebody's personal bias towards a perspective solution, that'd be another thing.

Read up on the interpretations of qm, as they attempt to provide a picture of what could be going on.