Why Does Rotating Coordinate Axes Affect Calculations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical problem involving the equation xy = 2 and the implications of rotating coordinate axes on calculations. Participants are examining a specific calculation step that leads to confusion regarding the interpretation of terms and the resulting values.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the steps taken in the calculation, particularly the multiplication of terms and the interpretation of variables x' and y'. There is a focus on understanding how the left-hand side of the equation relates to the right-hand side and the implications of the coordinate transformation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively seeking clarification on specific steps and terms used in the problem. There is a recognition of misinterpretations, and some participants are attempting to align their understanding of the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be confusion regarding the notation and the specific terms being used in the calculations, particularly concerning the transformation of coordinates and the implications of those transformations on the equation provided.

bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Screenshot2012-02-15at23607AM.png


17. xy = 2

Screenshot2012-02-15at23611AM.png


The Attempt at a Solution



Do you see that step where they do the following:

√2/2 - √2/2 = my answer is 0

and they multiply that to

√2/2 + √2/2 = my answer is √2

So to me the answer is 0 * √2 = 0, but the book shows that that calculation = 2, then they set x over 2 and y over 2, don't understand why.

I don't understand what the book is doing. I understand everything else except that one part.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi bobsmith76! :smile:
bobsmith76 said:
So to me the answer is 0 * √2 = 0, not 2

the answer to what? :confused:
 
see revision
 
bobsmith76 said:
Do you see that step where they do the following:

√2/2 - √2/2 = my answer is 0

and they multiply that to

√2/2 + √2/2 = my answer is √2

do you mean the LHS of the equation at the beginning of the last line? :confused:

then you're ignoring the x' and y'

that LHS multiplies out to 1/2 x'2 - 1/2 y'2, which you can see is the LHS of the next equation

(and the RHS of both equations stays as 2)
 
are you saying they square √2/2 - √2/2? if they do that is still zero. I don't know what you mean by I'm ignoring x'. What x' am i ignoring.
 
bobsmith76 said:
are you saying they square √2/2 - √2/2?

they don't have √2/2 - √2/2 !

are we looking at the same question? :confused:

all i'm seeing is something similar with x' and y'
 
They are NOT dealing with [itex]\sqrt{2}/2- \sqrt{2}/2[/itex], they are dealing with [itex](\sqrt{2}/2)x'- (\sqrt{2}/2)y'[/itex].
 
ok, thanks. I misread what I was reading I thought it was

(√2/2x' - √2/2x')(√2/2y' + √2/2y')
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K