Why Does the Complex Integral Not Represent Area Like in Real Calculus?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between contour integrals in complex analysis and traditional calculus. Unlike real calculus, where integrals represent the area under a curve, contour integrals in complex analysis lack physical meaning except in special cases. The user is studying from "Brown and Churchill, 6th edition" and is struggling with specific contour integrals, including those involving the function f(z) = Pi * exp(Pi z) and the branch z^(-1+i). The conversation highlights the concept of path integrals and their relation to winding numbers in complex analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex variables and functions
  • Familiarity with contour integration techniques
  • Knowledge of the logarithm function in the complex plane
  • Basic concepts of path integrals and winding numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of contour integrals in complex analysis
  • Learn about the Cauchy Integral Theorem and its applications
  • Explore the concept of residues and residue theorem in complex functions
  • Investigate the relationship between complex integrals and winding numbers
USEFUL FOR

Students and self-learners of complex analysis, particularly those encountering difficulties with contour integrals and their interpretations in relation to real calculus.

blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hi. I am studying on complex variables on my own using Brown and Churchill, 6th edition.
so far i am doing pretty good, but i have run into trouble doing a few contour integrals.

1. First off, the authors state that unlike in calculus, where the integral can mean area under the curve, in complex analysis, it does not have any physical meaning (except in rare special cases). this is what they claim. really? no physical meaning? i was very surprised to learn this. why isn't it just the area under the curve?

ok here are the problems i just can't get:

2. f(z) = Pi *exp(Pi z_) and C is the boundary of the square with vertices at the points 0,1, 1+i and i, the orientation of C is counterclockwise direction.
where z_ = x - i y.
i know I have to break up the integral into two. my limits of integration for both are going to be from 0 to 1 i believe.
the first one will be integral from 0 to 1 of (-i) * Pi *exp(Pi z_)
the second integral will be from 0 to 1 of (x+i) * Pi *exp(Pi z_)
then i add up the result. is that right?

3.

f(z) is the branch z^(-1+i) = exp((-1+i)*log[z]) ( |z|>0, 0<arg z <2 Pi)
and C is the positively oriented unit circe |z|=1.
I really thought i had this but my answer isn't right. (I have the solution)
I know log[z] = Ln r + i*theta
r = 1 so ln r = 0 so log[z] = i*theta

Integral from 0 to 2Pi of exp((-1+i)*i*theta) * (-1+i)*i
but it ain't workin'.

3. lastly,
f(z) is defined by the equations

f(z) = { 1 when y<0 and 4y when y>0}
and C is the arc from z = -1-i to 1+i along the curve y =x^3.

this i don't even know where to start.

thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in complex analysis the integrals are all path integrals, and they absically are similar to the path integral of dtheta, the angle form, so their interpretation is something like winding number.i.e. integrals of differentiable functions give zero around a path, but integrands which are not defiend everywhere give an answer that depends on how many times your path winds around those places where the integrand is not defined.

(The graph of a complex function is a surface in 4 space so "area under the curve" makes no sense.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K