I Why does the integral of sine of x^2 from - infinity to + infinity diverge?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter jaumzaum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Sine
jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
Hello guys. I was trying to evaluate the integral of sine of x^2 from - infinity to + infinity and ran into some inconsistencies. I know this integral converges to sqrt(pi/2). Can someone help me to figure out why I am getting a divergent answer?

$$ I = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} sin(x^2) dx = Im(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{ix^2} dx) $$

Now let's call:

$$ A=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{ix^2} dx $$
$$ A^2=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{ix^2} dx \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{iy^2} dy $$
$$ A^2=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{i(x^2+y^2)} dx dy $$
$$ A^2=\int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{+\infty} e^{ir^2}r dr d\theta $$
$$ A^2= -i\pi \left. e^{ir^2} \right|_0^{\infty} $$
$$ A^2= -i\pi (e^{i\infty}-1) $$

But we know ## lim_{M->\infty} e^{iM}## does not converge, so A^2 would not converge either!

However, if we consider ##e^{i\infty}## as being zero, we get:

$$A^2= i\pi$$
$$A=1/\sqrt{2}\pi(1+i)$$
$$I=\sqrt{\pi/2}$$

But why is ##e^{i\infty}## considered zero if ## lim_{M->\infty} e^{iM}## does not exist?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I delete my message.
[EDIT]
Going forward your way of
A^2=i\pi(e^{iR^2}-1), R\rightarrow \infty
=-\pi \sin R^2 - i\pi(1-\cos R^2)=\pi \sqrt{2} \sqrt{1-\cos R^2}e^{i\theta}
where
\theta = \arctan \frac{1-\cos R^2}{\sin R^2}+\pi
A=\sqrt{\pi \sqrt{2} \sqrt{1-\cos R^2}}e^{i\theta/2}
I=Im\ A= \sqrt{\pi \sqrt{2} \sqrt{1-\cos R^2}} sin (\theta/2)
I let Wolfram plot the graph. I draw red line y=##1/\sqrt{2}## of the expected limit.
plot integral 211226.png
 
Last edited:
This might be how to do it properly, using line integrals in the complex plane.

 
An informal way to do it would be to look at the integral: $$\int_0^\infty \sin (x^2) dx = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\int_0^{\sqrt{n\pi}}\sin(x^2)dx$$Then follow your technique to get
$$A^2 = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\int_0^{2\pi} \int_{-2n\pi}^{2n\pi}e^{ir^2}r dr d\theta$$Etc.
 
Last edited:
I think there is an error in ##\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{ix^2} dx \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{iy^2} dy =\int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{ir^2} r dr d\theta. ##

It looks like you're trying to apply Fubini's theorem, but that requires the integrand to be absolutely integrable, which ##e^{i(x^2+y^2)}## is not. If you try to write out the argument formally with limits, you should see what goes wrong- your integral for ##A^2## would be over a large rectangle, but you would want it to be over a disk for polar coordinates to be useful. This distinction wouldn't matter in the case that your function is absolutely integrable, because then the difference integrals over the two domains would tend to zero.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb and PeroK
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top