Why Does the Merry-Go-Round Spin at 0.276 rad/sec After the Child Jumps On?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blue5t1053
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a merry-go-round with a specified radius and rotational inertia, and a child running tangentially before jumping on. The objective is to determine the resulting angular velocity after the child jumps on, given the initial conditions and parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two methods for solving the problem, focusing on conservation of angular momentum. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of variables, particularly the meaning of 'm' and the initial angular momentum of the system.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about mass and momentum. Some have provided hints and corrections, guiding others to refine their calculations and understanding of the system's dynamics.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the initial state of the merry-go-round being at rest, which affects the calculations of angular momentum. Participants are clarifying the roles of different masses in the system and ensuring that only the child's momentum is considered initially.

blue5t1053
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Problem:
In a plyground there is a small merry-go-round of radius 3.91 m and rotational inertia 5.68e+03 kg m^2. A child of mass 199 kg runs at a speed of 3.09 m/sec tangent to the rim of the merry-go-round when it is at rest and then jumps on. Assume no friction in the bearing of the merry-go-round. What is the angular velocity of the merry-go-round and child?

Besides the child be a heavy example, I wasn't able to come up with the right answer of 0.276 rad/sec. What might I be doing wrong?

My Work:
I searched the archives and found two ways of solving the problem.
method \ 1 \ \Rightarrow m*v*r = (I_{merry-go-round} + I_{child}) \omega \ ; solving \ for \ \omega

method \ 2 \ \Rightarrow I_{merry-go-round} * \omega \ + \ m*v*r = (I_{merry-go-round} + I_{child}) \omega^{prime} \ ; \ solving \ for \ \omega^{prime}

What I came up with:

method \ 1 \ \Rightarrow (199 kg \ + (\frac{5680 kg*m^{2}}{3.91m^{2}}))*(3.09 \frac{m}{sec})*(3.91m) = ((5680 kg*m^{2}) + (199 kg * ((3.91m)^{2}))) \omega \ ; solving \ for \ \omega

\omega \ = \ 2.87

method \ 2 \ \Rightarrow ((5680 kg*m^{2}) * (\frac{3.09 \frac{m}{sec}}{3.91 m} * 2 \pi)) + (199 kg \ + (\frac{5680 kg*m^{2}}{(3.91m)^{2}})*(3.09 \frac{m}{sec})*(3.91m) = (5680 kg*m^{2} + (199 kg * (3.91m^{2})) \omega^{prime} \ ;
solving \ for \ \omega^{prime}

\omega^{prime} \ = \ 5.52
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a conservation of angular momentum problem, so method #1 makes sense. (You could use method #2 by setting \omega = 0--since it starts at rest, but then you're back to method #1.) But you didn't plug in the numbers properly. Hint: What's "m" stand for?
 
Am I to assume that 'm' is total mass of the system (merry-go-round + child) or merry-go-round for interia of the merry-go-round?
 
That would be incorrect. What's the total angular momentum of the system initially?
 
L = r *p

L = (3.91 m) * (371.53 kg) = 1452 kg*m \ ; \ merry-go-round \ without \ child
 
blue5t1053 said:
L = r *p
This is correct.

L = (3.91 m) * (371.53 kg) = 1452 kg*m \ ; \ merry-go-round \ without \ child
But this isn't quite right. What's 371.53 kg the mass of? What does "p" stand for?

Hint: What's the only thing moving initially?
 
I thought 'p' was for momentum of the merry-go-round. The only object moving initially is the child. If I apply the child attached to the merry-go-round initially with the starting speed, if I understand this correctly, would be

L = (3.91 m) * (199 kg) * (3.09 \frac{m}{sec}) = 2404.3 \frac{kg*m^{2}}{sec}
 
Last edited:
You forgot the speed of the child. (Yes, "p" stands for momentum, not just mass.)
 
I had a lapse of thought there. So I shouldn't include the mass of the merry-go-round?
 
  • #10
Until the kid jumps on it, the merry-go-round isn't moving and thus has no angular momentum. Only the kid has angular momentum (with respect to the center of the merry-go-round).
 
  • #11
So if I revisit method one...

L_{child} = (3.91 m) * (199 kg) * (3.09 \frac{m}{sec}) = 2404.3 \frac{kg*m^{2}}{sec}

L_{merry-go-round} = (3.91 m) * (371.531 kg) * (0 \frac{m}{sec}) = 0 \frac{kg*m^{2}}{sec}

I_{child} = (199 kg) * (3.91 m)^{2} = 3042.33 kg*m^{2}

method \ 1 \ \Rightarrow 2404.3 \frac{kg*m^{2}}{sec} = (5680 kg*m^{2} + 3042.33kg*m^{2} ) \omega \ ; solving \ for \ \omega \ = 0.2756 \frac{rad}{sec} = \ 0.276 \frac{rad}{sec}

Thanks!
 
  • #12
Looks good!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K