Why Does the Mirror Charge Method Double the Potential Energy?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mirror charge method in electrostatics, specifically addressing the potential energy of a point charge above a grounded conductor plane. Participants are exploring the implications of this method on the system's energy and electric field behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why the potential energy calculated using the mirror charge method appears to double compared to the expected energy of the conductor and point charge system. Some participants suggest applying Gauss's law to analyze the electric field in the region below the conductor, while others seek clarification on the terminology used regarding the "underside" of the conductor.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants engaging in clarifying questions and exploring different interpretations of the problem. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the dialogue indicates a productive examination of the underlying concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of grounding the conductor and the behavior of the electric field in regions where no charge is present. The original poster's confusion about the potential energy suggests a need for deeper exploration of the assumptions involved in the mirror charge method.

Aroldo
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
The situation is the classic one: a point charge q+ in a distance d above a conductor plane grounded:
The conductor is grounded so V = 0, for z = 0.
Also, far away from the system (x2 + y2 + z2 >> d) V --> 0

The argument to replace it for a q- charge seems perfect to me.
What I can't understand why W (potential energy) of the two point charges is twice as much as the conductor plane + q+ charge system.
I mean, why E = 0 for z < 0 in the conductor plane + q+.
Thank you a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try Gauss law on the "underside" of the conductor: no charge, no field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aroldo
What do you mean by 'underside', the region immediately bellow the conductor, or a phill box that starts inside the conductor and ends in z < 0?
 
Both give E = 0.

The mirror charge method only says something about the region where the real charge is (because a solution to the field equation is unique, anything is allowed, but the solution is only for that region).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K