Why does the model interaction for Cooper pairs make sense?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sam_bell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction Model
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formation of Cooper pairs in the context of superconductivity, specifically examining the reasoning behind the attractive interaction potential used in theoretical models. The scope includes theoretical understanding and conceptual clarification of the underlying physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand the rationale behind the attractive interaction potential used in the Cooper pair model, questioning why it is reasonable to posit such an attraction.
  • Another participant clarifies that the focus is on understanding the form of the interaction given the attraction, noting that the interaction is not operative for k values below the Fermi level due to the filled Fermi sea.
  • A participant suggests that the interaction potential U_kk' can be simplified to a constant value within a specific energy window and zero elsewhere, based on energy considerations related to phonon availability.
  • There is an emphasis on the context of low temperatures, which affects the occupancy of energy levels and the applicability of the interaction model.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to simplify the interaction model for understanding, but there is no consensus on the broader implications or the best approach to conceptualize the interaction.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights assumptions regarding the filled Fermi sea and the energy window for interactions, as well as the dependence on temperature conditions. There are unresolved aspects regarding the justification for the specific form of the interaction potential.

sam_bell
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I am trying to understand why Cooper pairs form. The textbook proof that I am reading (Grosso & Parravicini) starts out as follows: Imagine a 'passive' electron gas filled out to some Fermi sphere kF. Add two 'extra' electrons that interact via a potential U(x-x'). Transform to k-space and take the interaction U_kk' to be attractive within a narrow window of width hωD/2pi above the Fermi sphere. This is the part where I don't follow. Why is this reasonable? Why does this make sense?

Any insights or helpful leads would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Sam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean, "why posit any attraction at all?"
 
No, sorry, I would like to understand why the form given the attraction makes sense. It's beginning to make more sense to me. Would it be fair to say .. The interaction U_kk' for k < kFermi is not operative because of the filled Fermi sea, and not for |Ek-Ek'| >> hωD because no phonons are available to carry the energy discrepancy. Then, for simplicity, we take U_kk' = -U0 (a constant) within the window |Ek - Ek'| < hωD and zero elsewhere.
 
That's right - remember the context is of very low temperatures so all the lower energy levels are filled.

Note: the author is simplifying the situation in the hopes that this will help you imagine the situation.
If you continue to have trouble with this, you may be well advised to find another author who uses a different approach.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K