Why does the object disappear when viewed from face AD in a square glass block?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a square glass block (ABCD) and an object (O) placed near one face (AB). The question is about the visibility of the object when viewed from another face (AD), with multiple potential observations regarding its apparent position or visibility.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the behavior of light rays from the object to the viewing face, considering concepts like total internal reflection and the angles of incidence. There are attempts to visualize the path of light rays and their potential to escape or reflect within the glass block.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different scenarios regarding light behavior and reflection. Some hints and guidance have been provided, particularly regarding the angles and conditions for total internal reflection.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the conditions under which light rays may or may not exit the glass block, with specific attention to the angles involved and the implications of total internal reflection. The original poster expresses uncertainty about proving the visibility of the object based on the provided answer key.

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ABCD represents a square glass block. An object O is placed near the face AB as shown. When observed from the face AD, the object will

(a) appear midway between A and B
(b) appear nearer to A
(c) appear nearer to D
(d) not be seen at all

The answer key tells me that the answer is (d) but I don't know how to prove it.

Homework Equations



[itex]\frac{sin\ i}{sin\ r}=\frac{n_2}{n_1}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I was trying to show that all the rays of light from O to AD are parallel or convergent (real image) but was unsuccessful.
 

Attachments

  • optics.JPG
    optics.JPG
    2.5 KB · Views: 435
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


alexmahone said:
I was trying to show that all the rays of light from O to AD are parallel or convergent (real image) but was unsuccessful.

Hi alexmahone! :smile:

This isn't a focussing problem.

Hint: choose a typical point P on AB …

draw the ray OP … where does it go … does it hit AD …

if it does, can it get out, or is it internally reflected? :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi alexmahone! :smile:

This isn't a focussing problem.

Hint: choose a typical point P on AB …

draw the ray OP … where does it go … does it hit AD …

if it does, can it get out, or is it internally reflected? :smile:

The ray OP may escape through CD or get totally internally reflected at AD.

The minimum angle of incidence at AD is when P is very close to A.

So I only need to prove that total internal reflection occurs even when P is very close to A?
 
alexmahone said:
The ray OP may escape through CD or get totally internally reflected at AD.

The minimum angle of incidence at AD is when P is very close to A.

So I only need to prove that total internal reflection occurs even when P is very close to A?

Yup! :biggrin:
 


tiny-tim said:
Yup! :biggrin:

But what if the rays that are totally internally reflected at AD also totally internally reflect at CD, BC and AB respectively and ultimately exit through AD?

How do I exclude this possibility?
 
alexmahone said:
But what if the rays that are totally internally reflected at AD also totally internally reflect at CD, BC and AB respectively and ultimately exit through AD?

How do I exclude this possibility?

If it reflects off one side, it'll hit the next side at the complementrary (90º -) angle, so it should get out.

Even if the refractive index was so high that it couldn't get out, it would still get back to AD at the original angle, and go round again and again! :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
If it reflects off one side, it'll hit the next side at the complementrary (90º -) angle, so it should get out.

Even if the refractive index was so high that it couldn't get out, it would still get back to AD at the original angle, and go round again and again! :smile:

Thanks so much! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K