Perceived/actual distance (block of glass with logo in water)

  • Thread starter Thread starter 123456
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Glass Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The perceived distance of a logo embedded in a block of glass (n=1.52) and submerged in water (n=1.33) is calculated using the formula d' = d(n2/n1). The actual distance from the logo to the air is 4.7 cm, but the perceived distance must be calculated separately for the glass and water mediums. The perceived distance in the glass is 2.1 cm, and in the water, it is 1.12 cm, leading to a total perceived distance of 3.23 cm. The misunderstanding arises from incorrectly using the total distance from air instead of calculating the perceived distances based on the specific mediums.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of refraction indices (n=1.52 for glass, n=1.33 for water)
  • Familiarity with the formula for perceived distance in optics
  • Basic knowledge of light behavior in different mediums
  • Concept of weighted averages in distance calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of light refraction and Snell's Law
  • Learn about the implications of refractive indices in optical systems
  • Explore the concept of perceived distance in various mediums
  • Investigate practical applications of optics in design and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics enthusiasts, and professionals in fields involving optical design and engineering will benefit from this discussion.

123456
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A logo is embedded in a block of glass (n=1.52), 3.2cm beneath the top surface of the glass. The block is put under water so that there is 1.5cm of water above the top surface of the glass. The logo is viewed from directly above by an observer in air. How far beneath the top surface of the water does the logo appear to the observer?



Homework Equations



d' = d(n2)/n1
Where n2 is the refraction index of the medium in which the observer is and n1 is the RI of the medium in which the object is observed.

The Attempt at a Solution



Because the observer is observing the logo in materials with greater refractory indexes than air, the logo will appear closer than its actual distance.

The actual distance from the logo to air is 3.2 + 1.5 = 4.7cm

There are two perceived distances, one is the perceived distance of the logo in the block and the other is the perceived distance of the logo in water. Added together, this would be the total perceived distance.

Perceived distance of logo in block, as observed from air, is d(n2/n1) where n2 is air (≈1) and n1 is the block (given n = 1.52), so d' = 3.2 (1/1.52) = 2.1

Perceived distance of logo in water, as observed from air, is d(n2/n1), where n1 is water and the amount of water given is 1.5, so d' = 1.5 (1/1.33) = 1.12

Total distance = 1.12 + 2.1 = 3.23

I have the answer right, but only because I just kept plugging numbers and guessing.

Originally, I kept getting this wrong because I was using the total distance from air of the logo in water (3.2+1.5 = 4.7) as the actual distance, so I had d' = 4.7 (1/(1.33 +1.52), which was wrong.

What I don't get is why you can't use total distance of the logo from air (4.7) somehow to get the answer. Why is the distance of the logo in water only 1.5 and not 4.7? I'm probably missing something totally obvious or just overthinking it, but any insight would be welcome. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
123456 said:
What I don't get is why you can't use total distance of the logo from air (4.7) somehow to get the answer. Why is the distance of the logo in water only 1.5 and not 4.7? I'm probably missing something totally obvious or just overthinking it, but any insight would be welcome. Thanks!
The two distances are subject to different weighting factors, so adding them together with no weighting factor cannot tell you anything useful.
The problem is analogous to driving some distance at one speed and another distance at a different speed, and asking how long the journey takes. Adding the two distances is not a useful operation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K