Why does the order of operations work?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cash Fulton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operations Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the order of operations in mathematics, exploring why it exists, how it is applied, and the implications of changing conventions. Participants express confusion about the rationale behind the established order and its practical applications in evaluating expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the order of operations is a convention developed to avoid ambiguity in mathematical expressions, allowing for consistent evaluation.
  • One participant suggests the acronym PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction) as a mnemonic for remembering the order, while another proposes GEMDAS, emphasizing grouping.
  • There is a discussion about how expressions like 3 + 2/3 + 7 are interpreted, with some arguing for different groupings based on the order of operations.
  • Some participants express that changing the order of operations could lead to different interpretations of expressions, but others argue that parentheses can be used to enforce any desired order.
  • One participant introduces the concept of post operator notation (Polish notation), which eliminates the need for parentheses by placing operators before or after operands.
  • There is a clarification that the term "polish" in this context refers to the Polish people, not the furniture polish, highlighting the importance of terminology in mathematical discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the order of operations is a convention, but there is no consensus on the implications of changing this convention or the best way to teach it. Multiple competing views on grouping and notation persist throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the application of the order of operations in specific examples, indicating a need for clarity in teaching methods. The discussion also touches on the potential for different interpretations based on notation and grouping.

Cash Fulton
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
I have had this question bugging me for a while. I know how to use it, but why and how does it work? I heard it was for convention and you do the most complicated to the simplest operations to get the lowest terms but it still confuses me. Can anyone give me a clear and easy to understand explanation.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cash Fulton said:
I have had this question bugging me for a while. I know how to use it, but why and how does it work?
That's not really the question to ask. Order of operations is a convention that has been developed to enable people to evaluate complicated expressions. Without an established convention on the order, one person might evaluate 3 + 4 * 5 as 7 * 5 = 35, and another might evaluate this as 3 + 20 = 23.

In this fairly simple expression, the convention is that multiplications are to be performed before additions, so 3 + (4 * 5) = 23 is the agreed-upon answer.

When I was in Jr. High, and was first exposed to this concept, the acronym was MDAS, with a mnemonic of "My dear Aunt Sally." The idea was that multiplications and divisions were to be performed before additions and subtractions. Since then the acronym has be expanded to PEMDAS and possibly another that I don't remember. The acronym stands for Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplies, Divisions, Additions, Subtractions.

For example, ##3 + 2^4## would be evaluated as 3 + 16 = 19, and not as 3 + 2 raised to the 4th power. The exponent operation is higher order than the addition. To force the addition to be done first, parentheses need to be added, as ##(3 + 2)^4##, or 625.
Cash Fulton said:
I heard it was for convention and you do the most complicated to the simplest operations to get the lowest terms but it still confuses me. Can anyone give me a clear and easy to understand explanation.

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cash Fulton
Cash Fulton said:
I have had this question bugging me for a while. I know how to use it, but why and how does it work? I heard it was for convention and you do the most complicated to the simplest operations to get the lowest terms but it still confuses me. Can anyone give me a clear and easy to understand explanation.

Thanks.
Mark44 has a great reply, but I just wanted to add one thought about the order of operation. Perhaps you've been taught PEMDAS, parenthesis, exponents, etc from left to right (as alluded to above).

I would suggest GEMDAS... G= grouping = parenthesis, brackets, bracers, absolute value, radicals, and fraction bars (also called vinculums). Yes, fraction bars. if you have something like:

3+2/3+7 , it's implied that the top and bottom are grouped together. I tutor middle/school students and sometimes this trips them up.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cash Fulton
Fancypen said:
3+2/3+7 , it's implied that the top and bottom are grouped together. I tutor middle/school students and sometimes this trips them up.
If the above were written like this: ##\frac{3 + 2}{3 + 7}##, I would agree with you on the grouping. However, when it's written like 3 + 2/3 + 7, most would say this is the same as 3 + (2/3) + 7, with the division being higher priority than the two additions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cash Fulton
Right again Mark. I keep forgetting the formatting.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cash Fulton
but... why does it work?
 
What do you mean? It is a convention for writing the formulae.

We could change the convention to be whatever we want, then we would rearrange the order of the values, so that we get the correct answer.PEMDAS:
2+2/4*3 gives the answer of 2 1/6.

We could decide that the order is PSADME.
Then, to tell others how to get the right answer we would write it as
2+(2/(4*3)) ,which would still give the correct answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cash Fulton
But what if you were seeing the cost of whatever like this for example 2x + 4 = 8

Another order of operations wouldn't work for solving x. Damn! why is it so difficult for my mind to comprehend this?
 
It would work if you wrote the formula based on the alternate order of operations.

If we decided to change the convention to PSADME, then we would write it as

(2x)+4 = 8.

Without the parentheses, our new OoO would cause us to do the addition first, followed by the multiplication.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrewD and Cash Fulton
  • #10
I think you did it with that one Dave. Thank you oh mighty one!
 
  • #11
You can use parentheses to force any specific order of operation that you need. So any time it doesn't work, it is your fault. Parentheses are your friends.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cash Fulton
  • #12
It might be worth your while investigating post operator notation (sometimes called polish) in which the operator precedes the operands. No brackets are needed at all. (A variant is reverse polish in which the operator follows the operands. Hewlett Packard calculators used to use this). Compilers in computing usually convert mathematical expressions to reverse polish.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and Cash Fulton
  • #13
bhillyard said:
It might be worth your while investigating post operator notation (sometimes called polish) in which the operator precedes the operands. No brackets are needed at all. (A variant is reverse polish in which the operator follows the operands. Hewlett Packard calculators used to use this). Compilers in computing usually convert mathematical expressions to reverse polish.
Interesting, I'll check it out.
 
  • #14
Sometimes polish notation is called prefix, reverse polish is post fix and traditional is infix.
I.e. the operator is before, after or between the operands.
Incidentally polish in this context is pronounced as in a person from Poland not as in the stuff to make furniture shine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
  • #15
bhillyard said:
It might be worth your while investigating post operator notation (sometimes called polish) in which the operator precedes the operands. No brackets are needed at all. (A variant is reverse polish in which the operator follows the operands. Hewlett Packard calculators used to use this). Compilers in computing usually convert mathematical expressions to reverse polish.

bhillyard said:
Sometimes polish notation is called prefix, reverse polish is post fix and traditional is infix.
I.e. the operator is before, after or between the operands.
Incidentally polish in this context is pronounced as in a person from Poland not as in the stuff to make furniture shine.
And since it refers to Polish, the ethnic group, and not polish, the word is capitalized.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cash Fulton and pbuk

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K