Why Does the Osculating Circle Formula Involve Derivatives?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ele38
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Formula
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the osculating circle and its relationship to the radius of curvature, particularly for the curve y=x^2 at the point [0,0]. The radius of curvature is defined using the formula involving the first and second derivatives, which reflects how concavity affects the curve's turning behavior. The osculating circle is described as the circle that best approximates the curve at a specific point, linking the concept of curvature to the derivatives. Understanding concavity is crucial for grasping why the formula incorporates both derivatives. Further exploration of the topic can be found in related resources, such as Wikipedia articles on curvature.
Ele38
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi guys!
I learned yesterday what an osculating circle is and I am learning how to find the radius of curvature of some curves. For example I have found that for y=x^2 the radius of the osculating circle for the point [0,0] is 0.5 (That's why circular mirror works similarly to parabolic mirror, with the focus equal to radius/2, right?)
I found that result using non standard analysis, but I know that there is a formula that is used to find the radius of curvature.
\frac{(1+y'^2(x))^{3/2}}{|y''(x)|}
What I can figure out is why this formula can calcuate the radius, i do not understand why there are the first and the second derivatives of the function. Do you know how to demonstrate this formula?

Thanks,
Ele38
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem is that radius is defined for circles. The notion of "radius of curvature" for a general curve has to be defined. As you might expect, the greater the concavity of a curve, the quicker it is turning, much as a circle with a small radius turns sharply. Since concavity is tied to the second derivative, it is not surprising that the notion of radius of curvature involves first and second derivatives. Once you have that notion defined, the osculating circle is the circle that best fits the curve at a point. Google osculating circle to find more details and some nice animations.
 
Thank you, I did not think about concavity. What is "obscure" to me is what doest "circle that best fits the curve at a point" means in math language...
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K