MHB Why does the population go to extinction if the solution is real?

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
The population of a certain species subjected to a specific kind of predation is modeled
by the difference equation

$$
u_{t+1}=\frac{au_t^2}{b^2+u_t^2}, \quad a>0.
$$

Determine the equilibria and show that if $a^2 > 4b^2$ it is possible for the populationto be driven to extinction if it becomes less than a critical size which you should find.

So the steady states are

$u_*=0$

$u_*=\frac{a\pm\sqrt{a^2-4b^2}}{2}$

So why if the solution is real, does the population go to extinction?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
The population of a certain species subjected to a specific kind of predation is modeled
by the difference equation

$$
u_{t+1}=\frac{au_t^2}{b^2+u_t^2}, \quad a>0.
$$

Determine the equilibria and show that if $a^2 > 4b^2$ it is possible for the populationto be driven to extinction if it becomes less than a critical size which you should find.

So the steady states are

$u_*=0$

$u_*=\frac{a\pm\sqrt{a^2-4b^2}}{2}$

So why if the solution is real, does the population go to extinction?

The recursive relation can be written in the form...

$\displaystyle \Delta_{n}=u_{n+1}-u_{n}= - \frac{b^{2}\ u_{n} - a\ u^{2}_{n} - u^{3}_{n}}{b^{2}+u^{2}_{n}}= f(u_{n})\ ,\ a>0$ (1)

Under the hypothesis that is $a^{2}>4\ b^{2}$ and that is $u_{n} \ge 0\ \forall n$ the function f(x) has two 'attractive fixed points' in $x_{0}=0$ and $\displaystyle x_{+}= \frac{a+ \sqrt{a^{2}-4 b^{2}}}{2}$ and a 'repulsive fixed point' in $\displaystyle x_{-}= \frac{a- \sqrt{a^{2}-4 b^{2}}}{2}$. The solution of (1) depends from the 'initial state' $u_{0}$ and precisely...

a) if $0 \le u_{0} < x_{-}$ the sequence has limit $x_{0}=0$...

b) if $u_{0}=x_{-}$ the sequence has limit $x_{-}$...

c) if $u_{0}>x_{-}$ the sequence has limit $x_{+}$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
The recursive relation can be written in the form...

$\displaystyle \Delta_{n}=u_{n+1}-u_{n}= - \frac{b^{2}\ u_{n} - a\ u^{2}_{n} - u^{3}_{n}}{b^{2}+u^{2}_{n}}= f(u_{n})\ ,\ a>0$ (1)

Under the hypothesis that is $a^{2}>4\ b^{2}$ and that is $u_{n} \ge 0\ \forall n$ the function f(x) has two 'attractive fixed points' in $x_{0}=0$ and $\displaystyle x_{+}= \frac{a+ \sqrt{a^{2}-4 b^{2}}}{2}$ and a 'repulsive fixed point' in $\displaystyle x_{-}= \frac{a- \sqrt{a^{2}-4 b^{2}}}{2}$. The solution of (1) depends from the 'initial state' $u_{0}$ and precisely...

a) if $0 \le u_{0} < x_{-}$ the sequence has limit $x_{0}=0$...

b) if $u_{0}=x_{-}$ the sequence has limit $x_{-}$...

c) if $u_{0}>x_{-}$ the sequence has limit $x_{+}$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Unfortunately, I just don't understand what you are doing to help in this post (or the others). I am not saying you aren't helping. I just don't understand your procedures and methods.
 
dwsmith said:
Unfortunately, I just don't understand what you are doing to help in this post (or the others). I am not saying you aren't helping. I just don't understand your procedures and methods.

On MHF I wrote a tutorial section where the general procedure for solving this type of recursive relations was illustrated ... 'unfortunately' MHF collapsed and now, with the approval of Administrators, I can try to rewrite the same tutorial section on MHB...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
dwsmith said:
The population of a certain species subjected to a specific kind of predation is modeled
by the difference equation

$$
u_{t+1}=\frac{au_t^2}{b^2+u_t^2}, \quad a>0.
$$

Determine the equilibria and show that if $a^2 > 4b^2$ it is possible for the populationto be driven to extinction if it becomes less than a critical size which you should find.

So the steady states are

$u_*=0$

$u_*=\frac{a\pm\sqrt{a^2-4b^2}}{2}$

So why if the solution is real, does the population go to extinction?

Consider:

\[ \frac{u_{t+1}}{u_t}=\frac{au_t}{b^2+u_t^2}\]

\( \{u_t\} \) is a decreasing sequence if the above is less than \(1\). So solve:

\[ \frac{au_t}{b^2+u_t^2}<1\]

and the result will follow (you will need to justify it going to zero rather than decreasing to a non-zero limit but that is easily done).

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
Consider:

\[ \frac{u_{t+1}}{u_t}=\frac{au_t}{b^2+u_t^2}\]

\( \{u_t\} \) is a decreasing sequence if the above is less than \(1\). So solve:

\[ \frac{au_t}{b^2+u_t^2}<1\]

and the result will follow (you will need to justify it going to zero rather than decreasing to a non-zero limit but that is easily done).

CB

I am not sure how or why the result follows? That leads me to the same quadratic to solve but with an inequality.

From the cob web plot, I see there is only the zero steady state when a^2<4b^2

How could there be a critical extinction point if the only steady state is 0?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top