Why does the possible orbitals equal n squared?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbitals
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the mathematical reasoning behind why the number of possible orbitals in quantum mechanics equals n squared. It explains that for a principal quantum number n, the magnetic quantum number m can take on 2ℓ + 1 values for each angular momentum quantum number ℓ, which ranges from 0 to n-1. By summing these values, the total number of orbitals is derived as n(n-1 + 1), resulting in n squared. The conversation highlights the connection between this quantum mechanics concept and basic mathematical principles, emphasizing the discovery of relationships in mathematics. Understanding these connections enhances curiosity and appreciation for mathematical concepts.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41
If i take any integer, x

write out all integers from 0 to x - 1

write out all numbers between negative and positive values of those numbers

I get x squared total values. why? what is the mathematical logoc behind this?

x = 3
0 to x - 3 = 0, 1, 2

0
-1, 0, 1
-2, -1, 0, 1, 2

9 total values, x squared total values, but why does this work? how is that process related to squaring?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For a given value of the quantum number \ell, the magnetic quantum number m can run from -\ell to \ell, which means there are 2\ell + 1 values of m for each \ell. The quantum number \ell can run from 0 to n-1, where n is the principal quantum number. You can fill up orbitals for each \ell until you hit this max, so the total number of orbitals is

\sum_{\ell = 0}^{n-1} (2\ell + 1) = 2\left(\sum_{\ell = 0}^{n-1}\ell\right) + n

It is a know result that

\sum_{k=1}^{N} k = \frac{N(N+1)}{2}
hence, we get

2\left(\sum_{\ell = 0}^{n-1}\ell\right) + n-1 = 2\frac{(n-1)n}{2} + n = n(n-1 + 1) = n^2.
 
Thank you, I just couldn't find that connection and needed to know out of pure curiosity..
 
1MileCrash said:
Thank you, I just couldn't find that connection and needed to know out of pure curiosity..

You may not realize it, but that's a great thing that you discovered that relationship without knowing about the equation. There's a lot of cool relationships you'll discover in math.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
571
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K